|Table of Contents|

Two New Indicators to Compare Different Evaluation Methods’ Effect——Based on Times Higher-QS World University Rankings(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2008年03期
Page:
135-140
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Two New Indicators to Compare Different Evaluation Methods’ Effect——Based on Times Higher-QS World University Rankings
Author(s):
Yu Liping; Pan Yuntao; Wu Yishan
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038,China
Keywords:
S&;  T and educa tion eva luation;  side sameness;  different ra tio
PACS:
G640
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Adopting the da ta o f the 2007 T imes H igher- QS wor ld university rankings, th is paper ana ly zes wo rld un iver s ity rank ings according to pr inc iple com ponents ana lys is, factor ana lys is, techn ique for order pre fe rence by sim ilar ity to idea l so lution, rank sum ra tio, g rey re lational ana lysis, Entropy ana lysis, then ana ly ses the evalua tion resu lts sam eness and difference based on s ide sam eness ind icato r and d iffe rent ratio. The resu lts show the top un ive rs ities’ side sam eness is h igher than that of bo ttom un iversities, the side d ifferen t ra tios is h igher than that o fm idd le universities. The different ra tio is independent o f standard e rror. The evalua tion resu lts is a good m e thod to classify. Comb in ing peer rev iew w ith im persona l eva luation is su itab le form icrocosm ic rank ing.

References:

[ 1]  刘占伟, 邓四二, 滕弘飞. 复杂工程系统设计方案评价方法综述[ J] . 系统工程与电子技术, 2003( 12) : 1 488-1 491.
[ 2]  陈衍泰, 陈国宏, 李美娟. 综合评价方法分类及研究进展[ J] . 管理科学学报, 2004( 4): 69-79.
[ 3]  吴清平, 张丹. 秩和比法和几种常用评价方法在医疗质量评价中应用的比较[ J]. 中国医院统计, 2003( 3): 3-5.
[ 4]  M a rtin Ince. Ideas w ithout borders as ex ce llence goes g loba l[ EB /OL]. [ 2008-03-01]. http: / /www. tim eshighereduca tion.co. uk.
[ 5]  田凤调. 秩和比法及其应用[M ]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1993: 1-93.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2013-05-05