|Table of Contents|

Tourism Efficiency Research in Six Cities of Jiangsu BorderingYangtze River Based on the DEA and Malmquist Index(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2014年04期
Page:
120-
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Tourism Efficiency Research in Six Cities of Jiangsu BorderingYangtze River Based on the DEA and Malmquist Index
Author(s):
Wang Zhimin
Zhenjiang College,Zhenjiang 212003,China
Keywords:
tourism efficiency; DEA; index of Malmquist; efficiency rating; tourism districts border Yangtze River
PACS:
F59
DOI:
-
Abstract:
This article attempts to measure and evaluate the overall efficiency,technical efficiency and scale efficiency of city tourism resource development,which based on data envelopment analysis(DEA)with the Malmquist(MI)index of the five-year’s(from 2008-2012)panel data for six cities in Jiangsu Province.Basically,the overall operating efficiency of bordering the Yangtze River tourism development in Jiangsu is relatively high,the vast potential of tourism productive efficiency has been released in a good status; There are distinct differences among this region,due to facts which determine the tourism efficiency level are tourism technical development and technical efficiency,the tourism efficiency of Sunan cities is significantly higher than Suzhong’s.According to the analysis,several suggestions have been obtained:Strengthens regional integration and collaboration constantly,scale efficiency can be enhanced by increasing the input scale,and great efforts should be made to develop tourism creative industry,the promoting of tourism efficiency can be achieved by depth conformity development of tourism resources,as well as tourism production innovation; furthermore,by expanding the local tourism industry chain,the progress of technology revolution and concept innovation are used to improve tourism efficiency and promote the sustainable development of tourism resources.

References:

[1] 颜敏.江苏省旅游空间结构与区域旅游发展[D].南京:南京师范大学地理科学学院,2004:36.
[2]刘平珍,梁莉,张捷.基于旅游资源空间结构和市场通达度的旅游区划研究——以江苏沿江旅游发展为例[J].河南科学,2006,24(5):776-780.
[3]徐小波,侯兵.江苏沿江旅游开发等级配置研究——基于需求-供给匹配视角[J].扬州大学学报:人文社会科学版,2009,13(1):46-47.
[4]史春云,张捷,沈山,等.基于竞合模式的江苏沿江旅游空间组织研究[J].经济问题探索,2006(5):114-118.
[5](美)曼昆.经济学原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[6]马晓龙,保继刚.基于数据包络分析的中国主要城市旅游效率评价[J].资源科学,2010,32(1):88-97.
[7]Lee C K,Han S H.Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method[J].Tourism Management,2002,23(5):531-540.
[8]Preda P,Watts T.Improving the efficiency of sporting venues through capacity management:the case of the Sydney(Australia)cricket ground trust[J].Event Management,2003,8(2):83-89.
[9]李艳双,韩文秀,曾真香,等.DEA 模型在旅游城市可持续发展能力评价中的应用[J].河北工业大学学报,2001,30(5):62-66.
[10]马晓龙,保继刚.基于DEA的中国国家级风景名胜区使用效率评价[J].地理研究,2009(3):838-846.
[11]马晓龙,保继刚.中国主要城市旅游效率的区域差异与空间格局[J].人文地理,2010,25(1):105-110.
[12]马晓龙.基于绩效差异的中国主要城市旅游发展阶段演化[J].旅游学刊,2009,24(6):25-30.
[13]顾江,胡静.中国分省区旅游生产效率模型创建与评价[J].同济大学学报:社会科学版,2008,19(4):93-98.

[14]陶卓民,薛献伟,管晶晶.基于数据包络分析的中国旅游业发展效率特征[J].地理学报,2010(8):1 004-1 012.
[15]邓洪波,陆林.基于DEA模型的安徽省城市旅游效率研究[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(2):313-321.
[16]魏权龄.数据包络分析[J].科学通报,2000,45(7):1793-1806
[17]侯翔,马占新,赵春英.数据包络分析模型评述与分类[J].内蒙古大学学报:自然科学版,2010,41(5):583-593.
[18]Fare R,Grosskopf S,Norris M,et al.Productivity growth,technical progress,and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J].American Economic Review,1994,(84):66-83.
[19]梁明珠,易婷婷,Bin Li.基于DEA-MI模型的城市旅游效率演进模式研究[J].旅游学刊,2013(5):53-59.
[20]王灵,韩东林.基于DEA 模型的旅游业投资效率评价及对策研究——以皖苏浙沪比较为例[J].黄山学院学报,2011(1):19-21.
[21]张悟移,陈天明,王铁旦.基于DEA和Malmquist指数的中国区域环境治理效率研究[J].华东经济管理,2013(2):172-176.
[22]夏小莉,王兆峰,谭必四.文化创意旅游产业发展研究——基于产业价值链的视角[J].中国集体经济,2009(33):136-137.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-12-31