|Table of Contents|

Quantitative Analysis of the Coupling and Coordination RelationsBetween Coal Spatial Flow Efficiency and Industrial Structure(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2017年04期
Page:
137-
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Quantitative Analysis of the Coupling and Coordination RelationsBetween Coal Spatial Flow Efficiency and Industrial Structure
Author(s):
Zhang Xinlin1; Zhao Yuan1; 2
(1.School of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.Ginling College,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China)
Keywords:
coal flow; efficiency; industrial structure; coupling degree; coordination degree
PACS:
F062.1; P96
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2017.04.022
Abstract:
Based on analysis of coal flow efficiency and industrial structure,this paper examined the coupling and coordination relations between them. The results indicated:(1)Every efficiency in sink regions was larger in eastern regions than western regions;(2)For source regions,the overall efficiency was the largest in Inner Mongolia,and Xinjiang’s overall efficiency was the least; Pure technology efficiency’s influence on overall efficiency was larger than scale efficiency in Shanxi,Inner Mongolia and Shaanxi,but scale efficiency’s influence on overall efficiency was larger than pure technology efficiency;(3)Eastern region’s industrial structural fundamentals level is higher,and industrial structure is relatively reasonable,and industrial concentration degree is higher;(4)Sink regions’ coal flow efficiency and the three dimensions of industrial structure showed a correspondence in space; The coupling coordination degree is relatively high in high level of economic development areas; The average of coupling and coordination relations between the coal flow efficiency and the industrial concentration degree is the largest.(5)Source regions’ coal resources flow efficiency and industrial structure coupling coefficients are all up to the high coordination stage. Overall,the average of coupling and coordination relations between the coal flow efficiency and the fundamentals level is the largest. Finally,on the baisis of coupling and coordination relations between coal spatial flow efficience and industrial structure,some policy recommendations were proposed for the sink regions and source regions. These recommendations can help optimize the coal’s spatial allocation efficience,and the relevant departments can also make some decisions on the basis of this research.

References:

[1] 沈镭,刘立涛,高天明,等. 中国能源资源的数量、流动与功能分区[J]. 资源科学,2012,34(9):1 611-1 621.
[2]谢克昌. 中国煤炭清洁高效可持续开发利用战略研究(综合卷):中国煤炭清洁高效可持续开发利用战略研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2014.
[3]WANG J,FENG L,DAVIDSSON S,et al. Chinese coal supply and future production outlooks[J]. Energy,2013(60):204-214.
[4]ZHANG X L,ZHAO Y,XU X,et al. Decomposition and attribution analysis of industrial carbon intensity changes in Xinjiang,China[J]. Sustainability,2017,9(3):459-475.v[5]赵媛,于鹏. 我国煤炭资源空间流动的基本格局与流输通道[J]. 经济地理,2007,27(2):196-200.
[6]成升魁,徐增让,沈镭. 中国省际煤炭资源流动的时空演变及驱动力[J]. 地理学报,2008,63(6):603-612.
[7]王成金,莫辉辉,王姣娥. 中国煤炭资源的流动格局及流场规律研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2009,24(8):1 402-1 411.
[8]王宜强,赵媛. 中国煤炭资源流源-汇地空间格局演变与内部空间差异研究[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(10):1 153-1 160.
[9]嵇昊威,赵媛. 江苏省煤炭铁路运输通道运能估测与发展研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2010,33(1):120-124.
[10]嵇昊威,赵媛. 中国煤炭铁路运输网络可达性空间格局研究[J]. 地域研究与开发,2014,33(1):6-11.
[11]高天明,沈镭,刘立涛,等. 中国煤炭资源不均衡性及流动轨迹[J]. 自然资源学报,2013,28(1):92-103.
[12]王宜强,赵媛. 中国省域煤炭资源空间流动形成机制的主导要素解析[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(4):723-732.
[13]陈雅琳,高吉喜,李咏红,等. 江苏省煤炭资源流转及影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学,2010,32(7):1 259-1 265.
[14]徐增让,成升魁,谷树忠,等. 资源区域流动的驱动因子分析与流动潜力测度:以晋煤输出为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2008,23(5):773-780.
[15]王宜强,赵媛. 区域煤炭资源流动及其宏观经济效应初探:以内蒙古为例[J]. 干旱区地理,2015,38(1):163-172.
[16]王宜强,赵媛. 重庆市煤炭资源流动及其未来流量估测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(9):1 229-1 235.
[17]车亮亮,韩雪,赵良仕,等. 中国煤炭利用效率评价及与经济增长脱钩分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(3):104-110.
[18]武春友,岳良文,张米尔. 基于MFA和DEA的煤炭资源效率测算方法的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):135-142.
[19]李金三. 我国煤炭利用效率评价及其政策研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.
[20]张新林,赵媛. 基于空间视角的资源流动内涵与构成要素的再思考[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1 611-1 623.
[21]方叶林. 中国省域旅游业效率及演化机理研究[D]. 南京:南京师范大学,2014.
[22]关伟,许淑婷. 辽宁省能源效率与产业结构的空间特征及耦合关系[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(4):520-530.
[23]赵媛,郝丽莎,杨足膺. 江苏省能源效率空间分异特征与成因分析[J]. 地理学报,2010,65(8):919-928.
[24]ZHAO Y,HAO L,WAN L. Research on the spatial structure of crude oil flow and the characteristics of its flow field in China[J]. Energy policy,2007,35(10):5 035-5 050.
[25]赵媛,郝丽莎. 20世纪末期中国石油资源空间流动格局与流场特征[J]. 地理研究,2006,25(5):753-764.
[26]LI L B,HU J L. Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J]. Energy policy,2012(46):216-224.
[27]江洪,赵宝福. 碳排放约束下能源效率与产业结构解构、空间分布及耦合分析[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(1):152-162.
[28]魏权龄. 数据包络分析(DEA)[J]. 科学通报,2000,45(17):1 793-1 808.
[29]陶长琪,齐亚伟. 中国区域技术相对效率的时空演变分析[J]. 经济地理,2011,31(5):730-735.
[30]郑少智,陈志辉. 产业结构高级化与经济增长关系实证研究:基于全国、广东省及广州市数据的对比分析[J]. 产经评论,2011(3):55-60.
[31]干春晖,郑若谷,余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究导刊,2011(5):4-6.
[32]保罗·萨缪尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯. 经济学[M]. 17版. 萧琛,译. 北京:人民邮电出版社,2004.
[33]李江帆,李美云. 旅游产业与旅游增加值的测算[J]. 旅游学刊,1999(5):16-19.
[34]李晓梅,郭正模,刘金华. 老龄产业的跨行业特征与统计规范探讨[J]. 人口与经济,2016(1):29-38.
[35]谢园方,赵媛. 长三角地区旅游业能源消耗的CO2排放测度研究[J]. 地理研究,2012,31(3):429-438.
[36]韩元军,吴普,林坦. 基于碳排放的代表性省份旅游产业效率测算与比较分析[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(10):1 957-1 970.
[37]李江帆,张少华. 基于投入产出表的结构变迁与知识服务业发展研究[J]. 管理学报,2013,10(1):56-61.
[38]谢慧明,沈满洪,李中海. 中国城市居民旅游需求函数的实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2014,29(9):24-34.
[39]陶卓民,薛献伟,管晶晶. 基于数据包络分析的中国旅游业发展效率特征[J]. 地理学报,2010,65(8):1 004-1 012.
[40]安景文,张兴平,徐向阳. 煤炭企业的技术有效性和规模有效性评价[J]. 煤炭学报,1999,24(4):435-439.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-12-30