|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Production-Living-Ecology Integration Based onIntrinsic Spatial Distance—A Case Study of Yangzhong City(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2019年01期
Page:
132-
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Production-Living-Ecology Integration Based onIntrinsic Spatial Distance—A Case Study of Yangzhong City
Author(s):
Zhang Wenbin1; Fang Weixuan2; Ma Jianghong1
(1.College of Science,Chang’an University,Xi’an 710064,China)(2.Institute of Future Cities,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)
Keywords:
intrinsic spatial distance; production-living-ecology integration; spatial relationship
PACS:
P91
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2019.01.020
Abstract:
In the study of production-living-ecology(PLE)space,PLE integration is still a conceptualized idea. Quantifying the spatial relationship of PLE space is significant to reveal the integration state of PLE space and further promote PLE integration. In this paper,the spatial relationship of PLE space between any two objects is evaluated with intrinsic spatial distance which can capture their PLE structural difference and physical distance at the same time. According to the calculations of intrinsic spatial distance,the spatial relationship between one object and the whole objects is defined as the sum of the spatial relationships between this object and all other object. Then,PLE integration is defined as any object has the same spatial relationship with respect to the whole objects. Finally,the variation of the spatial relationship on each object with respect to the whole objects is quantified to analyze the integration state of PLE space. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively evaluate the integration state of PLE space in the study area,and it also has significance for how to further develop the PLE integration.

References:

[1] 李广东,方创琳. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[2]王丹,方斌,陈正富. 基于辐射模型及潜力模型划分城乡地域功能的土地整治模式[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(13):270-278.
[3]龙花楼,刘永强,李婷婷,等. 生态用地分类初步研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(1):1-7.
[4]郑百龙,翁伯琦,周琼. 台湾“三生”农业发展历程及其借鉴[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2006,8(4):67-71.
[5]方玮轩,方斌,蔡燕培. 城乡发展一体化的内涵、路径与土地资源利用路径选择[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2015,38(3):135-140.
[6]张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义. 中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[7]黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2017,36(3):378-391.
[8]刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[9]高星,刘瀚,吴克宁,等. 基于“三生融合”的普兰县土地资源现状与优化配置研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2016,44(4):453-457.
[10]方斌. 基于“三生”融合理念的乡村振兴突破路径研究[J]. 土地经济研究,2018(1):1-8.
[11]陈彦光. 基于Moran统计量的空间自相关理论发展和方法改进[J]. 地理研究,2009,28(6):1449-1463.
[12]王锐淇. 我国区域技术创新能力空间相关性及扩散效应实证分析:基于1997—2008空间面板数据[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2419-2432.
[13]骆永民,樊丽明. 中国农村基础设施增收效应的空间特征:基于空间相关性和空间异质性的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2012(5):71-87.
[14]苏良军,王芸. 中国经济增长空间相关性研究:基于“长三角”与“珠三角”的实证[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2007(12):26-38.
[15]张玉明,李凯. 省际区域创新产出的空间相关性研究[J]. 科学学研究,2008,26(3):659-665.
[16]吴军,魏安喜. 区域经济空间相关性的趋势分析及影响因素[J]. 经济经纬,2018,35(1):1-7.
[17]ANSELIN L. Local indicators of spatial association:LISA[J]. Geographical analysis,1995,27(2):93-115.
[18]ALDSTADT J,GETIS A. Using amoeba to create a spatial weights matrix and identify spatial clusters[J]. Geographical analysis,2010,38(4):327-343.
[19]CRESSIE N,CHAN N H. Spatial modelling of regional variables[J]. Journal of the American statistical association,1989,84(406):393-401.
[20]陈腾.“三化同步、三生融合”理念下的山地小城镇规划研究[J]. 小城镇建设,2013(9):38-42,46.
[21]高海峰,于立,梁林,等. “三生”融合视角下广东传统乡村聚落水体景观的解析与启示[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2016(12):63-66.
[22]王娜,张年国,王阳,等. 基于三生融合的城市边缘区绿色生态空间规划:以沈阳市西北绿楔为例[J]. 城市规划,2016,40(Suppl.1):116-120.
[23]LEUNG Y,MENG D,XU Z. Evaluation of a spatial relationship by the concept of intrinsic spatial distance[J]. Geographical analysis,2013,45(4):380-400.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-03-30