|Table of Contents|

The Pattern and Evolution Characteristics of ExportSimilarity of All Countries in the World(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2021年01期
Page:
50-56
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Pattern and Evolution Characteristics of ExportSimilarity of All Countries in the World
Author(s):
Li Enkang1; Chen Yu1; 2; 3; 4; Niu Bo1
(1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing 210023,China)(3.Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment of Ministry of Education,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(4.Rural Revitalization Research Institute,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
export similarity index; export trade; global market; geographic distance; spatial pattern
PACS:
K902
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2021.01.008
Abstract:
Based on the classic definition of export similarity index(ESI),the similarity degree of export products of 113 countries in the world market and its correlation with geographical distance from 2000 to 2016 were systematically sorted out and summarized from the perspective of vertical time dimension and horizontal geography. The paper mainly draws the following conclusions:The ESI between each two country in the world increases on the whole,but the internal difference is narrowing. The ESI between developed countries is obviously higher than that between developing countries. The high value areas of sum index of export similarity are mostly located in developed regions such as Europe and North America,while the low value areas are mostly distributed in less developed regions such as Africa and South America. In general,ESI shows a trend of“power law decreasing”with the increase of geographical distance,which reflects the geographical proximity of the global export industrial structure.

References:

[1] FINGER J M,KREININ M E. A measure of export similarity and its possible uses[J]. The economic journal,1979,89(356):905-912.
[2]金玮佳.“丝绸之路”经济带建设背景下中国与俄罗斯农产品贸易发展研究[J]. 世界农业,2016(10):150-156,260.
[3]余妙志,梁银锋,高颖. 中国与南亚地区农产品贸易的竞争性与互补性:以“一带一路”战略为背景[J]. 农业经济问题,2016,37(12):83-94,112.
[4]云如意. 中泰农产品贸易互补性与竞争性测算[D]. 广州:广东外语外贸大学,2020.
[5]王容博. 中国与其他金砖国家农产品贸易研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州财经大学,2019.
[6]许培源,朱金芸. TPP对中国机电产品出口的潜在影响:基于GTAP-CGE模型的评估[J]. 国际贸易问题,2016(9):71-83.
[7]杨逢珉,吴梦怡. 中国与其他“金砖国家”机电产品贸易竞争性和互补性研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2019,38(4):133-143.
[8]李元. 中国、东盟及南盟制造的出口体育用品国际贸易竞争力比较分析[J]. 首都体育学院学报,2020,32(3):251-256.
[9]李一莉. 一带一路与中国出口企业的战略区位再选择研究[D]. 温州:温州大学,2017.
[10]刘林青,谭畅. 中美知识产权密集型产业的竞争性与互补性研究[J]. 国际经贸探索,2017,33(4):94-106.
[11]潘旵,谢林志. 中德知识产权密集型产业竞合关系研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2019,38(5):45-54.
[12]冯根尧,冯千驹. 中韩文化创意产品贸易的竞合关系与比较优势[J]. 世界地理研究,2018,27(1):34-41.
[13]许明功. 海峡两岸服务贸易发展及竞争力比较[J]. 对外经贸,2015(7):17-18,48.
[14]ANTIMIANI A,CARBONE A,COSTANITINI V,et al. Agri-food exports in the enlarged European Union[J]. Agricultural economics,2012,58(8):354-366.
[15]RONDINELLA S,AGOSTINO M,DEMARIA F,et al. Similarity and competition in the agri-food trade among European mediterranean countries[J]. The international trade journal,2019,33(5):444-468.



[16]HOANG V. Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the association of Southeast Asian Nations countries[J]. Agricultural economics,2018,64(10):464-475.

[17]李星,王金波,佟继英. 中国—东盟贸易结构的测度与分析[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2018(9):18-25.
[18]杨宏恩,孙汶. 中国与东盟贸易的依存、竞争、互补与因果关系研究[J]. 管理学刊,2016,29(5):6-14.
[19]赵晓晓,彭世璞. 中国与中亚五国贸易格局的时间维度分析:基于“丝绸之路经济带”背景[J]. 价格月刊,2017(2):47-52.
[20]陈继勇,蒋艳萍,王保双. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家的贸易竞争性研究:基于产品域和市场域的双重视角[J]. 世界经济研究,2017(8):3-14,135.
[21]王金波.“一带一路”经济走廊贸易潜力研究:基于贸易互补性、竞争性和产业国际竞争力的实证分析[J]. 亚太经济,2017(4):93-100,175.
[22]张珺,钟湘玥. 中国与“一带一路”沿线地区的贸易关系研究:基于2001—2013年增加值贸易核算的实证分析[J]. 西部论坛,2017,27(5):102-110.
[23]沈子傲,韩景华. 中国与中东欧贸易合作研究:基于贸易互补性和竞争性的视角[J]. 国际经济合作,2016(8):55-63.
[24]寻琛. 中美贸易结构研究[D]. 青岛:青岛大学,2016.
[25]张群. 中国货物贸易结构演进研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2015.
[26]庞德良,华景斌. 基于商品和服务贸易全视角的中日韩贸易竞争与互补分析[J]. 社会科学战线,2019(2):43-53.
[27]NGUYEN T N A,PHAM T H H,VALLEM T. Similarity in trade structure:evidence from ASEAN+3[J]. Journal of international trade and economic development,2017,26(8):1000-1024.
[28]MARYAM J,BANDAY U J,MITTAL A. Trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage:an analysis of Intra-BRICS trade[J]. International journal of emerging markets,2018,13(5):1182-1195.
[29]CHATAGNIER J T,KAVAKL K C. From economic competition to military combat:export similarity and international conflict[J]. Journal of conflict resolution,2017,61(7):1510-1635.
[30]BAHAR D,HAUSMANN R,HIDALGO C A. Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations:evidence of international knowledge diffusion[J]. Journal of international economics,2014,92(1):111-123.
[31]史智宇. 出口相似度与贸易竞争:中国与东盟的比较研究[J]. 财贸经济,2003(9):53-57,97.
[32]JOANES D N,GILL C A. Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis[J]. Journal of the royal statistical society:Series D(The statistician),1998,47(1):183-189.
[33]李恩康,陆玉麒,杨星,等. 全球城市网络联系强度的时空演化研究:基于2014—2018年航空客运数据[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(1):32-39.
[34]马学广,鹿宇. 基于航空客运流的中国城市空间格局与空间联系[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(8):47-57.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-03-15