|Table of Contents|

Declaration of “International Wetland City”and Wetland Environmentally Friendly Behavior:an Empirical Study Based on Huai’an(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2022年01期
Page:
96-103
Research Field:
·生态学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Declaration of “International Wetland City”and Wetland Environmentally Friendly Behavior:an Empirical Study Based on Huai’an
Author(s):
Chen Yan1; An Lijie2; Chen Hong1; Feng Chao3
(1.Huaiyin Normal University,Huaian 223300,China)(2.Woosuk University,Joenju 55338,South Korea)(3.School of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China)
Keywords:
International Wetland City; pro-environmental behavior; wetland protection; policy recommendations; Huai’an
PACS:
X24
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2022.01.014
Abstract:
“International Wetland City”,has been the world-class green city business card favored by various countries and regions around the world. Based on the background of Huai’an’s positive declaration of “International Wetland City”and urban residents as survey samples,this paper measures and uates their attitude to participate in the declaration of “International Wetland City”and their behavior of wetland pro-environmental behavior,trying to reveal people’s willingness to participate in and support the government’s advocacy,as well as the concept of sustainable development and awareness of ecological environmental protection. Based on the sample data of 300 urban residents in Huai’an City,the analysis results show that the attitude of residents to participate in the declaration of “International Wetland City”and the behavior of wetland pro-environmental behavior are in the upper middle(stronger)level,Among them,residents’ attitude towards participating in the declaration of “International Wetland City”includes three dimensions,declaration motivation,declaration opportunity and declaration ability. Wetland pro-environmental behavior includes wetland environment maintenance behavior and wetland environment-promotion behavior. At the same time,the three dimensions of residents’ participation in the declaration of “International Wetland City”and the two types of wetland pro-environment behavior are basically positively correlated,which shows that they have mutually promoting effects. Based on the research conclusions,this paper puts forward specific policy recommendations to help relevant government departments to declare“International Wetland City”,and guide urban residents to improve the concept of environmental protection,so as to realize the benign interaction and sustainable development of city image,wetland ecology and resident tourism.

References:

[1] 新华社. 习近平:让湿地公园成为人民群众共享的绿意空间[EB/OL].(2020-04-01)[2020-11-03]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2020-04/01.
[2]吴菊,乔伟峰,王亚华. 1990年以来苏州城市化发展过程及其驱动机制研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2020,43(3):99-105.
[3]雷茵茹,徐慧博,崔丽娟,等. 赋予城市新身份:《湿地公约》湿地城市认证系统[J]. 湿地科学与管理,2018,14(3):23-26.
[4]郑国全. 湿地公园生态旅游环境容量测评研究——以下渚湖国家湿地公园为例[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(3):39-45.
[5]宋珂,樊正球,信欣,等. 长治湿地公园生态旅游环境容量研究[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版),2011,50(5):576-582.
[6]李秋成. 人地、人际互动视角下旅游者环境责任行为意愿的驱动因素研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2015.
[7]孔艺丹,黄子璇,陶卓民,等. 基于乡村性感知的游客环境责任行为影响机制研究——以南京市江宁区为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2019,42(1):124-131.
[8]李文明. 生态旅游环境教育效果评价实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2012,27(12):80-87.
[9]李悦铮,牟方元,梁娟. 湿地旅游资源评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(1):192-197.
[10]张华,贾恩睿,方奕袭,等. 海口国际湿地城市的经验与启示[J]. 湿地科学与管理,2019,15(1):23-26.
[11]尹泽生,谢文元. 大庆漫游[M]. 北京:北京出版社,1999.
[12]李想. 关于加大湿地生态保护力度的若干建议[J]. 能源与环境,2019(1):94-95.
[13]MACINNIS D J,JAWORSKI B J.Information processing from advertisements:toward an integrative framework[J]. Journal of marketing,1989,53(4):1-23.
[14]宋小康,赵宇翔,宋士杰,等. 基于MOA理论的健康谣言分享意愿影响因素研究[J]. 情报学报,2020,39(5):511-520.
[15]陈则谦. MOA模型的形成、发展与核心构念[J]. 图书馆学研究,2013(13):53-57.
[16]JEPSON A,CLARKE A,RAGSDELL G. Investigating the application of the motivatione opportunity eability model to reveal factors which facilitate orinhibit inclusive engagement within local community festivals[J]. Scandinavian journal of hospitality and tourism,2014,14(3),331-348.
[17]王兆峰,向秋霜. 基于MOA模型的武陵山区社区居民参与旅游扶贫研究[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,44(6):94-102.
[18]KOLLMUSS A,AGYEMAN J. Mind the gap:why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?[J]. Environmental education research,2002,8(3):239-260.
[19]邱宏亮,范钧,赵磊. 旅游者环境责任行为研究述评与展望[J]. 旅游学刊,2018,33(11):122-138.
[20]RAMKISSOON H,SMITH L D G,WEILER B. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours:a structural equation modelling approach[J]. Tourism management,2013,36:552-566.
[21]LEE T H. Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development[J]. Tourism management,2013,34:37-46.
[22]HUANG C,CHIU Y,FANG W,et al. Assessing the performance of Taiwan’s environmental protection system with a non-radial network DEA approach[J]. Energy policy,2014,74:547-556.
[23]张俊. 基于游客认知视角的旅游地安全风险评价研究[D]. 泉州:华侨大学,2014.
[24]刘克勇,邓泽林. 建立基于公共服务的国家公园体制[J]. 林业经济,2014(4):3-7.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01