|Table of Contents|

Ideological and Political Design and Practice in “Biogeography” Course Based on Hybrid Teaching(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2023年S1期
Page:
59-62
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Ideological and Political Design and Practice in “Biogeography” Course Based on Hybrid Teaching
Author(s):
Han Cheng1; 2; Hu Zhujun1; Deng Yongcui1; Jiang Yunbin1; 2
(1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
(2.Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution Control,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
curriculum-based ideological and political education; hybrid teaching; theory and practice; ideological value guidance
PACS:
P935
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.S1.010
Abstract:
Biogeography is a discipline that studies the distribution laws of surface biological communities and the causes of their formation. It attaches equal importance to both theory and practice. A hybrid teaching model can effectively stimulate students' interest in learning and improve their learning results. Biogeography focuses on the interaction between man and nature, biology and environment, and biology and biology. It has attributes of geography, biology, ecology, and so on. It runs through ideological and political education in its teaching process, which helps realize the fundamental task of cultivating human beings by virtue. However, the combination of ideological and political education with the course content of the biogeography major is weak in the current hybrid teaching in colleges and universities. Its ideological and political teaching cases and integration modes are also lacking, so designing and exploring appropriate ideological and political education resources is urgent. Based on the hybrid teaching of biogeography, such as online and offline, theory and practice, this paper excavates the ideological and political elements and typical teaching cases of biogeography attributes and integrates them into the thematic discussion and dialogue teaching of the course to construct ideological and political goals such as scientific literacy, feelings of home and country, dialectical thinking, and the view of harmony between man and earth, and realize the organic combination of professional knowledge teaching and ideological value guidance.

References:

[1] 习近平.思政课是落实立德树人根本任务的关键课程[J].求是,2020(17):4-16.
[2] 怀进鹏.不断推动高校思想政治工作高质量发展[N].人民日报,2021-12-10.
[3] 教育部.教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知(教高〔2020〕3号)[EB/OL].(2020-05-28).http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm.
[4] 江苏省教育厅.省教育厅关于深入推进全省高等学校课程思政建设的实施意见(苏教高〔2020〕3号)[EB/OL].(2020-07-07).http://jyt.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2020/7/9/art_58366_9307413.html.
[5] 殷秀琴.生物地理学[M].2版.北京: 高等教育出版社,2014.
[6] 苏旭,吕婷,刘玉萍,等.《生物地理学》教学改革探索与实践[J].中央民族大学学报(自然科学版),2018,27(2): 68-71.
[7] 张芬,勾晓华.植物地理学课程教学改革与探索[J].高等理科教育,2022(6):20-26.
[8] 姜倪皓,张诗函.植物地理学课程思政元素的挖掘与实践[J].辅导员,2022(5): 1-3.
[9] 孟昭虹,吴欣柯,曹文静.高师院校植物地理学课程思政教学探索[J].黑龙江高教研究,2022,40(10): 149-153.
[10] 于兵,戎可,刘丙万.“生物地理学”在线课程建设及混合式教学研究[J].科教导刊:电子版,2021(19): 186-187.
[11] 邓敏,王永翠,唐智,等.混合式教学模式在地理教学中的应用效果评价——以“自然地理学”课程为例[J].教育教学论坛,2021(42): 49-52.
[12] 陈华洲.思想政治教育资源论[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2007.
[13] 陈展图,肖伟丽,李诗涵.“目标—思路—方法—评价”四位一体的高校课程思政教学设计探索——以人文地理学为例[J].地理教育,2022(2): 73-78.
[14] 陶吉兴.古籍中的植物地理学[J].浙江林业,2022(6): 44-45.
[15] 国家林草局,农业农村部,自然资源部,生态环境部,住房和城乡建设部,海关总署.重点管理外来入侵物种名录[EB/OL].(2022-12-23).http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-12/23/content_5733232.htm.
[16] 高晓雁.问题式教学模式的创新与实施[J].中国高等教育,2008(24): 43-44.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-09-25