«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:

2023年S1期

Page:

132-140

Research Field:

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

A Preliminary Study on Geographical Environmentl Education in Middle School From the Perspective of Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education

Author(s):

Yang Shihan¹; Shen Weidan²; Bao Kunshan¹

(1.School of Geography,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)
(2.No.1 Middle School of Huaihua Railway,Huaihua 418000,China)

Keywords:

geographical environment; curriculum-based ideological and political education; field practice

PACS:

G633.55

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.S1.024

Abstract:

Curriculum ideology and politics(CIP)is a hot topic in the education field recently and has been well integrated into curriculum in higher education, but the degree of integration in middle school education needs to be improved. The geography curriculum of middle school is centered on environmental education and the idea of harmony between the human and the land, and has good opportunities for CIP infiltration in terms of core quality and teaching materials. However, the teachers' misunderstanding, the rigid classroom contents, and the weak implementation ways of CIP lead to the unsatisfactory effect of the combination between geographical environmental education and CIP. In this paper, three teaching strategies were proposed based on the textbook design, the combination of geographical environment in daily life and the integration of education and entertainment through field practice. With the theme of environmental protecion of the Zhanjiang mangrove wetlands in Guangdong, we designed a curriculum example that combines CIP with geography field practice in middle school, implements the cultivation goal of morality and people, and enriches the ideological and political data base of geographical environmental education in middle school. It provides reference for the integration of CIP and geographical environmental education in secondary education.

References:

[1] 李国娟.构建“同向同行、协同育人”新机制[J].红旗文稿,2017(12): 21-23.
[2] 韦志榕,朱翔.普通高中地理课程标准(2017年版)解读[M].北京: 高等教育出版社,2018: 76.
[3] 朱雪梅,姚慧.从《地理教育国际宪章》看地理基础教育的改革发展[J].中国教育学刊,2020(3): 93-97.
[4] 何柳珊.高中地理课程思政实践及其对学生价值观的影响研究[D].海口:海南师范大学,2020.
[5] 周瑞霞.课程思政在高中地理教学中的实践研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2022.
[6] 张莉,赖坤汉,陈正桃.廉江高桥国家级红树林保护区建设的现状及对策[J].海洋信息,2002(2): 18-20.
[7] 熊卉,何昌泽,陈粤超,等.廉江高桥红树林湿地生态系统多样性及管护对策[J].广东林业科技,2013,29(4): 68-73.
[8] 林广旋,卢伟志.湛江高桥红树林及周边地区植物资源调查[J].广东林业科技,2011,27(5): 38-43.
[9] 林康英,张倩媚,简曙光,等.湛江市红树林资源及其可持续利用[J].生态科学,2006(3):222-225.
[10] 刘南威.自然地理学[M].北京:科学出版社,2014: 276-277.
[11] 李跃林,宁天竹,徐华林,等.深圳湾福田保护区红树林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011,31(2): 41-49.
[12] 李永琪.海洋恢复生态学[M].山东: 中国海洋大学出版社,2016: 118-119.
[13] 唐剑武,叶属峰,陈雪初,等.海岸带蓝碳的科学概念、研究方法以及在生态恢复中的应用[J].中国科学: 地球科学,2018,48(6): 661-670.
[14] 赵鹏,胡学东.国际蓝碳合作发展与中国的选择[J].海洋通报,2019,38(6): 613-619.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2023-09-25