|Table of Contents|

Research on Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Accessibility of Childcare Institutions in Chengdu Based on Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2024年01期
Page:
30-39
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Accessibility of Childcare Institutions in Chengdu Based on Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method
Author(s):
Tan Wanli1; Zhao Yuan1; 2; Yan Jiyao2
(1.Jinling College,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China)
(2.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
childcare institutions; spatial distribution; accessibility; two-step floating catchment area method; Chengdu
PACS:
K901.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.01.005
Abstract:
Childcare service is a strong support for the policy system of childbearing support. Scientific evaluation of the spatial distribution characteristics of childcare institutions is the premise for rational allocation of childcare service resources. In this paper,the kernel density analysis method is used to study the spatial distribution characteristics of childcare institutions in Chengdu,and the Gaussion two-step floating catchment area method is used to measure the spatial accessibility of childcare institutions in Chengdu. The focus is on the analysis of the single effective service threshold of 20-min and the three-tier effective service threshold divided by the size of childcare institutions. The results show that:(1)Childcare institutions in Chengdu generally show a distribution pattern of more in central cities and less in suburban new towns.(2)There are large differences in the spatial layout of childcare institutions of different natures, with a higher proportion of non-universalized childcare institutions in central city and a more balanced mix of childcare institutions of different natures in suburban new towns.(3)The accessibility of childcare institutions in the central and western regions of Chengdu is better than that in the east. It is more reasonable to evaluate the spatial accessibility of childcare institutions in Chengdu according to the three-tier effective service thresholds of scale.

References:

[1]洪秀敏,陶鑫萌,李汉东.“全面二孩”政策下托育服务资源需求规模预测:基于对2020—2035年城乡0～3岁婴幼儿人口的估算[J]. 学前教育研究,2021(2):16-29.
[2]张婵娟. 0-3岁托育机构从业人员现状分析及对策研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2019.
[3]BURGER K. How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive development?An international review of the effects of early interventions for children from different social backgrounds[J]. Early childhood research quarterly,2009,25(2):140-165.
[4]BURCHINAL M,ZASLOW M,TARULLO L,et al. Quality thresholds,features,and dosage in early care and education:secondary data analyses of child outcomes[J]. Monographs of the society for research in child development,2016,81(2):1-126.
[5]SIRAJ-BLATCHFORD I,TAGGART B,SYLVA K,et al. Towards the transformation of practice in early childhood education:the effective provision of pre-school education(EPPE)project[J]. Cambridge journal of education,2008,38(1):23-36.
[6]LAYZER J I,GOODSON B D. The“quality”of early care and education settings:definitional and measurement issues[J]. Evaluation review,2006,30(5):556-576.
[7]GORDON J A,HERBST C M,TEKIN E. Who's minding the kids?Experimental evidence on the demand for child care quality[J]. Economics of education review,2021,80:102076.
[8]刘中一. 全面两孩政策下我国托育服务发展的对策建议[J]. 湖南社会科学,2017(5):52-57.
[9]张海峰,黄楹,童连,等. 上海市0～3岁婴幼儿托育服务需求、利用与供给现况研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2021,29(5):532-536.
[10]潘鸿雁. 我国普惠性托育服务的发展与思考:基于上海市普惠性托育点的调查[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020(1):178-188.
[11]张本波,魏义方. 人口政策与托育服务资源配置:进展、问题与建议[J]. 宏观经济管理,2019(4):36-41.
[12]矫佳凝. 城市家庭婴儿托育服务模式与品质的需求研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2019.
[13]高琛卓,杨雪燕,井文. 城市父母对0～3岁婴幼儿托育服务的需求偏好:基于选择实验法的实证分析[J]. 人口研究,2020,44(1):85-98.
[14]和建花. 部分发达国家0～3岁托幼公共服务经验及启示[J]. 中华女子学院学报,2018,30(5):109-116.
[15]时扬. 婴幼儿托育服务政策的国际比较及对我国的启示[D]. 上海:华东师范大学,2019.
[16]洪秀敏,陶鑫萌. 改革开放40年我国0～3岁早期教育服务的政策与实践[J]. 学前教育研究,2019(2):3-11.
[17]李平华,陆玉麒. 可达性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 地理科学进展,2005,24(3):69-78.
[18]LIU S,ZHU X. An integrated GIS approach to accessibility analysis[J]. Transactions in GIS,2004,8(1):45-62.
[19]陶卓霖,程杨,戴特奇. 北京市养老设施空间可达性评价[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(5):616-624.
[20]李保杰. 徐州市养老机构空间分布特征与可达性研究[J]. 现代城市研究,2019(6):54-59.
[21]仝德,孙裔煜,谢苗苗. 基于改进高斯两步移动搜索法的深圳市公园绿地可达性评价[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(7):1113-1126.
[22]钟少颖,杨鑫,陈锐. 层级性公共服务设施空间可达性研究:以北京市综合性医疗设施为例[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(4):731-744.
[23]张琪,谢双玉,王晓芳,等. 基于空间句法的武汉市旅游景点可达性评价[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(8):200-208.
[24]贺丹,庄亚儿,杨胜慧. 婴幼儿托育:家庭需求与机构供给[J]. 人口与社会,2021,37(4):15-23.
[25]刘庆芳,宋金平. 西藏自治区县域基础教育设施空间分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(7):84-92.
[26]方远平,陆莲芯,毕斗斗,等. 珠江三角洲港资服务业企业的空间格局及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(9):1421-1428.
[27]柳泽,杨宏宇,熊维康,等. 基于改进两步移动搜索法的县域医疗卫生服务空间可达性研究[J]. 地理科学,2017,37(5):728-737.
[28]蒋涛. 经济活动空间分布、区域收入差异与公共政策:基于空间经济学的理论探讨[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2008(8):117-120.
[29]王雅楠,高传胜,刘竞龙. 托育服务发展中的社会力量与政府作用:基于上海市民办托育机构空间分布的公平与效率分析[J]. 当代经济管理,2022,44(12):39-49.
[30]陈偲,陆继锋. 公共托育服务:框架、进展与未来[J]. 行政管理改革,2020(6):60-66.
[31]任锋. 育儿家庭对普惠性托育服务模式的偏好与支付意愿[J]. 人口与经济,2023(1):57-70.
[32]罗若愚,刘怡,踪家峰. 居住分异下成都公共服务设施空间布局研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018,19(2):68-77.
[33]许昕,赵媛. 南京市养老服务设施空间分布格局及可达性评价:基于时间成本的两步移动搜索法[J]. 现代城市研究,2017(2):2-11.
[34]程顺祺. 幼儿园空间布局及其优化研究[D]. 福州:福建师范大学,2016.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-03-15