|Table of Contents|

Research on Spatial Pattern Evolution and Driving Factors of Urban Consumption Vitality:a Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Hefei(PDF)

《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2024年01期
Page:
40-47
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on Spatial Pattern Evolution and Driving Factors of Urban Consumption Vitality:a Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Hefei
Author(s):
Lu ShanYu RuiZheng Zhiyuan
(College of Architecture and Art,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230601,China)
Keywords:
urban consumption vitalityspatial pattern evolutiondriving factorsgeographic detector
PACS:
TU984.16
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.01.006
Abstract:
Taking the main urban area of Hefei as an example,using POI data and combining kernel density analysis,average nearest neighbor index,and standard deviation ellipse,the evolution process of urban consumption vitality space from 2012 to 2020 is analyzed,and the driving factors affecting urban consumption vitality are studied using geographic detector. The results show that:(1)The consumption spatial pattern has evolved from “single core diffusion” initially to “multi core connection”,gradually evolving from point axis to block spatial pattern in spatial form.(2)In terms of spatial evolution trend,the consumption vitality space mainly presents a development trend from northeast to southwest,while the development trend from north to south is relatively weak.(3)In terms of spatial evolution rate,the agglomeration degree of urban consumption vitality space increased from 2012 to 2016,and showed a slowing trend from 2016 to 2020.(4)The transportation service capacity and public service level have strong impacts on the urban consumption vitality,and there is a dual factor enhanced interaction among various driving factors.

References:

[1]ZENG C,SONG Y,HE Q,et al. Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality:case studies in Chicago and Wuhan[J]. Sustainable cities and society,2018,40:296-306.
[2]LIU S,ZHANG L,LONG Y. Urban vitality area identification and pattern analysis from the perspective of time and space fusion[J]. Sustainability,2019:11(15):4032.
[3]王娜,吴健生,李胜,等. 基于多源数据的城市活力空间特征及建成环境对其影响机制研究:以深圳市为例[J]. 热带地理,2021,41(6):1280-1291.
[4]徐子贤. 基于多源大数据的城市综合活力测度及影响因素研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2022.
[5]唐璐,许捍卫,丁彦文. 融合多源地理大数据的城市街区综合活力评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2022,24(8):1575-1588.
[6]明雨佳,刘勇,周佳松. 基于大数据的山地城市活力评价:以重庆主城区为例[J]. 资源科学,2020,42(4):710-722.
[7]舒天衡,任一田,申立银,等. 大型城市消费活力的空间异质性及其驱动因素研究:以成都市为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(1):16-21.
[8]严朝霞,季民河,宋太新. 上海城市道路对消费活力的影响:基于POI密度与多样性分析[J]. 苏州科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,34(2):73-80.
[9]徐杨菲. 城市空间中的消费活力与区位价值:影响因素与作用机制[D]. 北京:清华大学,2017.
[10]徐勇,石昌浩,窦世卿,等. 特大城市消费活力空间格局及驱动因素对比研究[J]. 无线电工程,2022,52(11):2054-2061.
[11]刘庆果,张煊赟,莫钧雄,等. 基于地理探测器的山东省土地城镇化时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 资源开发与市场,2022,38(10):1168-1174.
[12]牟凤云,李秋彦,马英,等. 基于地理探测器的重庆市城镇建设用地变化及驱动因素研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(11):74-81.
[13]王志伟. 大数据视角下合肥市中心城区商业中心空间特征及优化研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2021.
[14]敬峰瑞,孙虎,袁超. 成都市旅游资源吸引力空间结构特征[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(2):303-313.
[15]李壮,季民,张镯漫. 基于地理探测器的合肥市热岛效应影响因素分析[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息,2022,45(3):56-59.
[16]陈田田,黄强,王强. 基于地理探测器的喀斯特山区生态系统服务关系分异特征及驱动力解析:以贵州省为例[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(17):6959-6972.
[17]张文琦,王垚,曹月娥. 基于地理探测器的乌鲁木齐市居民宜居满意度影响机理[J]. 湖北农业科学,2022,61(14):211-218.
[18]田娟娟,张金锁. 基于地理探测器的中国碳排放时空分布特征及驱动因素研究[J]. 生态经济,2022,38(7):13-20.
[19]李辉丹,史东梅,夏蕊,等. 基于地理探测器的重庆坡耕地时空格局演变特征及驱动机制[J]. 农业工程学报,2022,38(12):280-290.
[20]冯小威,樊良新,王宝山,等. 基于夜间灯光数据的长三角城市群城市用水时空演变及驱动研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报,2022,33(4):97-107.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-03-15