|Table of Contents|

Research on the Accurate Evaluation Model of Experts in Science and Technology Plan Project Review: Taking Jiangsu Province's Science and Technology Plan Project Review as an Example(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2024年01期
Page:
133-141
Research Field:
计算机科学与技术
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on the Accurate Evaluation Model of Experts in Science and Technology Plan Project Review: Taking Jiangsu Province's Science and Technology Plan Project Review as an Example
Author(s):
Li Bin1; Li Xuhong1; Ying Mei2
(1.Productivity Center of Jiangsu Province,Nanjing 210042,China)
(2.Jiangsu Academy of Science and Technology for Development,Nanjing 210042,China)
Keywords:
Jiangsu; science and technology plan project; expert portrait; intelligent evaluation; research integrity
PACS:
G311
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.01.015
Abstract:
The review experts are the key core of the review work for science and technology plan projects,and their professional competence,integrity,and other factors are crucial to ensuring the quality of the review results. This article takes the evaluation of science and technology projects in Jiangsu Province as an example,and explores the construction of an intelligent evaluation model for evaluation experts covering multiple dimensions of objective and subjective factors using big data analysis technology. It can accurately draw expert holograms and has certain reference value for optimizing existing expert evaluation models and achieving refined expert management.

References:

[1]邵红琪,刘雪艳,张琪,等. 山东省科技计划项目评审改革现状及对策建议[J]. 中国科技资源导刊,2021,53(2):72-80.
[2]GHORBANI A. A review of successful construction project managers' competencies and leadership profile[J]. Journal of rehabilitation in civil engineering,2023,11(1):76-95.
[3]CHEN S,LIU J,ZHANG Q,et al. A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture,utilization,and storage(CCUS)toward carbon neutrality[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews,2022,167:112537.
[4]罗军,陈之瑶,莎薇,等. 科技计划项目评审专家工作质量元评价体系及应用研究——以广东省重点领域研发项目为例[J]. 科技管理研究,2021,41(13):65-70.
[5]SAMPAIO S,WU Q,CORMICAN K,et al. Reach for the sky:Analysis of behavioral competencies linked to project success[J]. International journal of managing projects in business,2022,15(1):192-215.
[6]HOU L,TAN Y,LUO W,et al. Towards a more extensive application of off-site construction:a technological review[J]. International journal of construction management,2022,22(11):2154-2165.
[7]江笑颜,李栋亮. 多层次、智能化的项目评审专家管理体系构建研究——基于广东科研项目评审专家管理的优化[J]. 科技管理研究,2018,38(16):212-217.
[8]ELROD C C,STANLEY S M,CUDNEY E A,et al. Management information systems education:a systematic review[J]. Journal of information systems education,2022,33(4):357-370.
[9]VAGALE A,OUCHEIKH R,BYE R T,et al. Path planning and collision avoidance for autonomous surface vehicles I:a review[J]. Journal of marine science and technology,2021:1-15.
[10]杨健安,刘传斌,余乐安. 基于相对逆序数的评审专家可信度评价方法[J]. 统计与决策,2022,38(3):184-188.
[11]杨晓秋,李旭彦. 同行评议中的异常数据检测方法研究——以科研项目评审为例[J]. 中国软科学,2016(5):133-142.
[12]张尧,林春. 专家评审特征分析及专家反评估方法研究[J]. 工业工程,2020,23(6):124-130+154.
[13]汪建,王裴裴,丁俊. 科技计划项目专家评审的元评价综合模型研究[J]. 科研管理,2020,41(2):183-192.
[14]李旭彦,宋英华,杨晓秋. 基于PageRank的评审专家信誉度度量方法[J]. 科研管理,2016,37(3):133-142.
[15]黄进. 科学基金项目评审专家科研信誉综合评价体系研究:基于“能力-行为-绩效”的视角[J]. 中国科学基金,2012,26(1):57-60+64.
[16]蔡文学,温旖旎,郑顺潮,等. 基于偏差度权重的科技计划项目评审专家绩效评价方法研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2012,32(15):75-78,83.
[17]张金焕. 科技评价中专家评审粗差数据的处理及仿真[J]. 计算机仿真,2013,30(7):214-217+255.
[18]徐林生,王执铨,戴跃伟. 评审专家可信度评价模型及应用[J]. 南京理工大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(1):30-34.
[19]李樵,王菲菲. 认知视角下创新性研究的同行评议:偏差与干预[J]. 科学学研究,2021,39(8):1354-1363.
[20]张琼丽,陈翼. 科技成果评价中专家评级模型研究[J]. 技术与市场,2022,29(9):136-138.
[21]陈观林,侍晓龙,周梁,等. 基于深度强化学习的文本相似语义计算模型[J]. 郑州大学学报(理学版),2020,52(3):1-8.
[22]钟桂凤,庞雄文,孙道宗. 基于差分进化的卷积神经网络的文本分类研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2022,45(1):136-141.
[23]武永亮,赵书良,李长镜,等. 基于TF-IDF和余弦相似度的文本分类方法[J]. 中文信息学报,2017,31(5):138-145.
[24]新华社. 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见》[EB/OL].(2018-05-30)[2023-08-05]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm.
[25]周颖,王蒲生. 同行评议中的利益冲突分析与治理对策[J]. 科学学研究,2003,21(3):298-302.
[26]吴刚,霍红,任之光,等. 管理科学部RCC评审机制试点效果分析[J]. 中国科学基金,2022,36(1):81-88.
[27]王贤慧. 探析同行评议中的学术评价回避制度[J]. 科技视界,2015(24):85.
[28]陈宜瑜. 健全学术不端惩戒机制 加强科研诚信建设 稳步推进科学基金监督工作[J]. 中国科学基金,2016,30(3):197-199.
[29]王大阜,邓志文,贾志勇,等. 多维属性视角下学者用户画像构建及合作学者推荐研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2023,46(3):112-122.
[30]李昱,赵静宜,左家平. 人工智能赋能科技管理变革的新趋向[J]. 科技智囊,2022(4):52-60.
[31]陈晓峰,蔡敬羽,刘永坚. 科技期刊同行评议中审稿人激励措施研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(11):1157-1163.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-03-15