|Table of Contents|

Research on the Willingness of Tourists to Compensate for Cultural Ecology in Traditional Village Tourism Destinations:a Case Study of Luxiang,Yangwan,Mingyuewan and Dongcun in Suzhou(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2024年03期
Page:
63-71
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on the Willingness of Tourists to Compensate for Cultural Ecology in Traditional Village Tourism Destinations:a Case Study of Luxiang,Yangwan,Mingyuewan and Dongcun in Suzhou
Author(s):
Gu Yi1; Xu Dong1; Yu Peng1; Yu Fenglong1; Zhang Jinhe2
(1.School of Tourism and Culinary Science,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225127,China)
(2.School of Geography and Ocean Science,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
traditional village tourism destinations; cultural ecological compensation; tourists; willingness to compensate; influencing factor
PACS:
K901.6; F592.7
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.03.008
Abstract:
Conducting research on tourists' willingness to compensate for cultural ecology is the basic theoretical work for the establishment of long-term compensation mechanism of cultural ecology in traditional village tourism destinations,and is a necessary prerequisite for promoting cultural ecology protection and high-quality development of rural tourism. Taking four tourism traditional villages of Luxiang,Yangwan,Mingyuewan and Dongcun in Suzhou at different stages of development and degrees of openness as examples,this paper comprehensively uses the questionnaire survey,contingent valuation method and binary logistic regression model to explore tourists' willingness to compensate for cultural ecology and its influencing factors. The results show that:(1)Tourists have a relatively high willingness to compensate for cultural ecology in traditional village tourism destinations. Among 614 survey samples,64.98% of the tourists are willing to pay for cultural ecological compensation,with an average of 51.06 yuan per visit. And they prefer to establish a special fund for cultural ecological compensation. Part of the tourists refuse to compensate mainly because they regard cultural ecology services as public goods and tend to rely on the government to be solely responsible for compensation.(2)Education level,awareness of cultural ecological values,tourist satisfaction,and cultural ecological compensation necessity cognition have significant and positive influence on the willingness of tourist to compensate for cultural ecology,while low revisiting willingness has a significantly negative impact. However,factors such as gender,age,monthly income,concern about cultural ecological destruction,and tourism motivation have no significant effects. The findings have implications for revealing complex willingness of tourists to compensate for cultural ecology and the influencing mechanism of its multiple factors,and could guide the protective compensation work of cultural ecology in traditional village tourism destinations.

References:

[1]胡燕,陈晟,曹玮,等. 传统村落的概念和文化内涵[J]. 城市发展研究,2014,21(1):10-13.
[2]汪瑞霞. 传统村落的文化生态及其价值重塑:以江南传统村落为中心[J]. 江苏社会科学,2019(4):213-223.
[3]黄震方,陆林,苏勤,等. 新型城镇化背景下的乡村旅游发展:理论反思与困境突破[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(8):1409-1421.
[4]黄震方,黄睿. 城镇化与旅游发展背景下的乡村文化研究:学术争鸣与研究方向[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(2):233-249.
[5]邓先瑞. 试论文化生态及其研究意义[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,42(1):93-97.
[6]赖力,黄贤金,刘伟良. 生态补偿理论、方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(6):2870-2877.
[7]刘春腊,龚娟,徐美,等. 文化生态补偿的理论内涵及框架探究[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(9):12-16.
[8]欧阳志云,郑华,岳平. 建立我国生态补偿机制的思路与措施[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(3):686-692.
[9]杨枫. 论连片特困地区文化生态补偿机制建立的意义[J]. 学理论,2014(8):136-138.
[10]刘春腊,徐美,刘沛林,等. 传统村落文化景观保护性补偿模型及湘西实证[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(2):382-397.
[11]杨军辉. 我国旅游村寨民族文化补偿机制构建[J]. 改革与战略,2017,33(6):128-131.
[12]杨军辉,李同昇. 民族旅游地游客民族文化补偿认知与支付意愿:以贵州西江千户苗寨为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(5):203-208.
[13]杨军辉,李同昇,徐冬平. 民族旅游村寨居民文化补偿认知的空间分异及机理:以贵州西江千户苗寨为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2015,34(9):1167-1178.
[14]王维艳. 农业文化遗产旅游利用与保护补偿机制研究:基于《物权法》之地役权制度视角[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(12):101-110.
[15]洪学婷,黄震方,于逢荷,等. 长三角城市文化资源与旅游产业耦合协调及补偿机制[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(9):222-232.
[16]胡欢,章锦河,刘泽华,等. 国家公园游客旅游生态补偿支付意愿及影响因素研究:以黄山风景区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(12):2012-2022.
[17]李军红. 传统村落生态补偿机制研究[J]. 思想战线,2015,41(5):88-92.
[18]曹莉萍,周冯琦,吴蒙. 基于城市群的流域生态补偿机制研究:以长江流域为例[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(1):85-96.
[19]孙佼佼,郭英之. 自然保护地数字文化生态系统服务质量测度与出游意愿效应:以中国五地国家公园网络空间为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2023,38(4):983-994.
[20]唐小飞,黄兴,夏秋馨,等. 中国传统古村镇品牌个性特征对游客重游意愿的影响研究:以束河古镇、周庄古镇、阆中古镇和平遥古镇为例[J]. 旅游学刊,2011,26(9):53-59.
[21]姚延波,贾广美. 社交媒体旅游分享对潜在旅游者冲动性旅游意愿的影响研究:基于临场感视角[J]. 南开管理评论,2021,24(3):72-82.
[22]张琰飞,朱海英,刘芳. 旅游环境、消费习惯与低碳旅游参与意愿的关系:以武陵源自然遗产地为例[J]. 旅游学刊,2013,28(6):56-64.
[23]吴开松,郭倩. 文化生态视域下传统村落活态保护研究[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,40(3):114-124.
[24]王兆峰,向秋霜. 景观感知和地方依恋对居民文化补偿认知的影响与分异[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(5):220-229.
[25]张翔,杨桂华,祝霞,等. 苗族原生态文化村寨旅游者动机及开发策略:以西江千户苗寨为例[J]. 贵州民族研究,2015,36(4):144-147.
[26]吕龙,黄震方,李东晔. 乡村文化记忆资源的“文-旅”协同评价模型与应用:以苏州金庭镇为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(7):1570-1585.
[27]徐冬,黄震方,洪学婷,等. 乡村旅游地文化胁迫类型、格局与机理研究:以苏州东山镇为例[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(10):2249-2267.
[28]朱羽佳,汪德根,周国艳. 传统村落居业分离式空心化识别及驱动机制:以苏州市东村为例[J]. 城市规划,2022,46(7):96-107.
[29]石玲,马炜,孙玉军,等. 基于游客支付意愿的生态补偿经济价值评估:以武汉素山寺国家森林公园为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):180-188.
[30]王亚如,王尔大,于洋. 基于游客环境属性意愿支付的游憩承载力评价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(5):1153-1163.
[31]袁建琼,张璐璐. 动机、经验和满意度对游客支付意愿和目的地忠诚度的影响:以张家界国家森林公园为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2022,42(2):191-202.
[32]陈冬冬. 乡村民宿消费者旅游动机、感知服务质量与支付意愿的关联性研究[J]. 贵阳学院学报(自然科学版),2023,18(1):14-19.
[33]于文金,谢剑,邹欣庆. 基于CVM的太湖湿地生态功能恢复居民支付能力与支付意愿相关研究[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(23):286-293.
[34]李伯华,谭红日,刘沛林,等. 少数民族传统村落文化补偿价值评价:以怀化市皇都村为例[J]. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版),2022,38(3):84-92.
[35]HOMBURG C,HOYER W D,KOSCHATE N. Customers' reactions to price increases:Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter?[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science,2005,33(1):36-49.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-09-15