|Table of Contents|

The Conception Positioning and Effect Evaluation of Cityand Industry Integration—A Case Study of Yangzhong(PDF)

《南京师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2016年02期
Page:
120-
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Conception Positioning and Effect Evaluation of Cityand Industry Integration—A Case Study of Yangzhong
Author(s):
Yang Hui1Fang Bin123Qu Ying1Cui Jichang1
(1.New-Type Urbanization and Rural Land Issues Research Center,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing 210023,China)(3.Jiangsu
Keywords:
city-industry integrationconception positioningeffectevaluation
PACS:
F590
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2016.02.021
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper is to position and extend the conception of city-industry integration,and to build the development framework of human-based city-industry integration,as well as choose the index system to evaluate the integration effect and investigate the land use mode choice in city-industry integration. The results showed that in Yangzhong and each town,the economic growth,the growth of different industries and the growth of the number of people employed all expressed strong stability,which matched the integrated development of urban and rural. The index calculation results indicated that utilizing the potential of primary industry can create more derivative third industries,and result in lager capacity to absorb employees than second industry. This paper concluded that primary industry and towns should be involved in the city-industry integration. Integrated development of urban and rural is the final embodiment of city-industry integration. Stability of the growth of the economic value,the number of people employed and the per capita GDP can be adopted in the evaluating index system.It is an important way for the rural city-industry integration to give priority to develop those agriculture developed regions,and strengthen the primary industry-driven third industry path.

References:

[1] 卫金兰,邵俊岗. 产城融合研究述评[J]. 特区经济,2014(2):81-82.
[2] 张道刚. 产城融合的新理念[J]. 决策,2011(1):1.
[3] 李文彬,陈浩. 产城融合内涵解析与规划建议[J]. 城市规划学刊,2012(7):99-103.
[4] 杜宝东. 产城融合的多维解析[J]. 规划师,2014,30(6):5-9.
[5] 孔翔,杨帆. “产城融合”发展与开发区的转型升级[J]. 经济问题探索,2013(5):124-128.
[6] 夏骥. 对上海郊区产城融合发展的思考[J]. 城市管理,2011(9):58-61.
[7] 刘儒,王文. 产城融合发展的“歪子路径”[J]. 农村·农业·农民,2014(1):48-50.
[8] 殷德生,江海英. 产城融合中的“三区联动”运行机制与中国实践模式[J]. 北华大学学报(社会科学版),2014,15(3):27-32.
[9] 林华. 关于上海新城“产城融合”的研究:以青浦新城为例[J]. 上海城市规划,2011(5):30-36.
[10] 梁华石,张浩,陈晓竹,等. 南京六合开发区产城融合的空间优化[J]. 城乡建设,2014(3):31-33.
[11] 高纲彪. “产城融合”视角下产业集聚区空间发展研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2011:63.
[12] 钟顺昌,李坚,简光华. 产城融合视角下城镇化发展的新思考[J]. 商业时代,2014(17):39-42.
[13] 徐松亮,张永庆,缪宇音,等. 大学校区、科技园区、公共社区:上海市“三区融合、联动发展“研究[M]. 上海:上海三联书店,2009:13-14.
[14] 张永庆. “三区融合、联动发展”理论研究[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007(4):13-16.
[15] 孙红军,李红,赵金虎. 产城融合评价体系初探[J]. 科技创新导报,2014(2):248-249.
[16] 苏林,郭兵,李雪. 高新园区产城融合的模糊层次综合评价研究:以上海张江高新园区为例[J]. 工业技术经济,2013(7):12-16.
[17] 王菲. 基于组合赋权和四格象限法的产业集聚区产城融合发展评价研究[J]. 生态经济,2014,30(3):36-41.
[18] 唐晓宏. 基于灰色关联的开发区产城融合度评价研究[J]. 上海经济研究,2014(6):85-92.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-06-30