|Table of Contents|

Species Composition and Population Structure Dynamics of Sinomanglietia glauca Community(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2024年04期
Page:
98-105
Research Field:
生态学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Species Composition and Population Structure Dynamics of Sinomanglietia glauca Community
Author(s):
Zhang Chengcheng1; Xiao Zhiyong2; Xu Jiawen3; Lin Guojiang4; Gao Wei4; Chen Fang4; Yang Qingpei5
(1.Department of Landscape Architecture,Fujian Forestry Vocational and Technical College,Nanping 353000,China)
(2.Yichun Academy of Sciences,Yichun 336000,China)
(3.Jiangxi Academy of Forestry,Nanchang 330045,China)
(4.Fujian Forestry Vocational and Technical College,Institute of Forest Ecology and Carbon Sink Measurement,Nanping 353000,China)
(5.College of Forestry,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China)
Keywords:
Sinomanglietia glauca; extremely small population; plantpopulation structure; time series prediction; survival analysis
PACS:
X176
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.04.011
Abstract:
Sinomanglietia glauca is a rare and endangered plant endemic to our country. It is a typical extremely small population plant. In order to clarify the survival status and endangered mechanism of this population and formulate effective conservation strategies,based on the data of 1 hm2 Sinomanglietia glauca continuous plots,a static life table was compiled with population size class structure instead of age structure,and a time series prediction model was established for survival analysis,the population characteristics and dynamics of Sinomanglietia glauca were studied. 133 species of vascular plants belonging to 48 families,82 genera were found in Sinomanglietia glauca community. Phyllostachys edulis was the dominant species with an importance value of 48.7,followed by Sinomanglietia glauca with an importance value of 5.86. Only Sinomanglietia glauca and Dalbergia hupeana were the deciduous tree species in the top 10 tree layer important values. The secondary character of Sinomanglietia glauca community was obvious,and its population mainly distributed in the mixed forest of bamboo and broad-leaved. Sinomanglietia glauca population had a pyramid-shaped age structure,characterized by having many seedlings and the number of individuals decreasing significantly with the increase of diameter class. Time series prediction analysis showed that the number of large diameter individuals increased after the population experienced 2,4,6 and 8 age classes. The survival analysis showed that survival rate of the population was low and the cumulative mortality rate was high in early stage,but the mortality rate decreased sharply from the IV age group to the V age group,and the population declined in the Ⅷ age group. The population of Sinomanglietia glauca decreased sharply in the early stage and declined in the later stage,which made the population increase and population diffusion hindered and formed the extremely small population. In the in situ protection of Sinomanglietia glauca,it is necessary to thin the associated tree species appropriately,reduce canopy density and adjust interspecific relationship,so as to promote benign regeneration of different age classes.

References:

[1]SCHLEUNING M,FRUND J,SCHWEIGER O,et al. Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change[J]. Nature communications,2016,7:13965.
[2]张光富,熊天石,孙婷,等. 江苏珍稀濒危植物的多样性、分布及保护[J]. 生物多样性,2022,30(2):31-40.
[3]HEDRICK P W. A standardized genetic differentiation measure[J]. Evolution,2005,59(8):1633-1638.
[4]白小节,申开平,穆君,等. 濒危植物小黄花茶种群数量结构与生存潜力分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2022,30(5):718-726.
[5]马丹丹,库伟鹏,夏国华,等. 珍稀濒危植物堇叶紫金牛种群结构及动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):159-164.
[6]赵家豪,叶钰倩,孙晓丹,等. 江西武夷山珍稀濒危植物南方铁杉种群动态与空间分布[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(10):4032-4040.
[7]刘海洋,金晓玲,沈守云,等. 湖南珍稀濒危植物——珙桐种群数量动态[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(24):7738-7746.
[8]王世彤,李玲丽,徐耀粘,等. 极小种群野生植物长果安息香种群结构与动态特征[J]. 植物科学学报,2022,40(5):627-636.
[9]罗西,郭秋菊,姚兰,等. 濒危植物鹅掌楸的天然种群结构特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(7):115-123.
[10]宋述灵,姚小华,余泽平,等. 江西官山乐昌含笑群落组成、种群动态与自然择优[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2018,40(3):533-544.
[11]GLOBAL TREE ASSESSMENT. The state of the world's trees[R]. Trinidod and Tobago:Botanic Gardens Conservation International,2021.
[12]俞志雄. 华木莲属──木兰科一新属[J]. 江西农业大学学报,1994,16(2):202-204.
[13]刘亚林. 濒危植物华木莲(木兰科)的小尺度空间遗传结构研究[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2022.
[14]林新春,俞志雄,裘利洪,等. 濒危植物华木莲的遗传多样性研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2003,25(6):805-810.
[15]熊敏,田双,张志荣,等. 华木莲居群遗传结构与保护单元[J]. 生物多样性,2014,22(4):476-484.
[16]杨清培,肖智勇,胡晓东,等. 珍稀植物华木莲的现代濒危机制:探析与展望[J]. 广西植物,2017,37(5):653-660.
[17]陈昕. 遮光与施肥对珍稀植物华木莲(Sinomanglietia glauca)光合生理的影响[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2017.
[18]俞志雄,廖军,林新春,等. 华木莲植物群落的生态学研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,1999,21(2):73-77.
[19]张兴旺,谢艳萍,周圣哲,等. 极小种群野生植物观光木种群结构与数量动态[J]. 普洱学院学报,2022,38(6):14-18.
[20]肖书礼,付梦媛,杨科,等. 极小种群野生植物峨眉含笑的种群结构与数量动态[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(7):1279-1288.
[21]谭菊荣,袁位高,李婷婷,等. 极小种群野生植物细果秤锤树种群结构与动态特征[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(9):3678-3687.
[22]解婷婷,苏培玺,周紫鹃,等. 荒漠绿洲过渡带沙拐枣种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(15):4272-4279.
[23]MOLLER R L,FUJII. Plant community,primary productivity,and environmental conditions following wetland re-establishment in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,California[J]. Wetlands ecology and management,2010,18(1):1-16.
[24]刘烁. 毛竹蔓延过程中林内光环境变化对其他树种的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2010.
[25]黄孝风. 竹阔树种幼苗更新及种间竞争对土壤供氮变化的响应[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2021.
[26]朱升起,颜立红. 珍稀濒危植物领春木群落调查初报[J]. 湖南林业科技,1997,24(2):67-69.
[27]郭起荣,俞志雄,施建敏. 华木莲与木莲属两树种光合生理生态研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2003,25(5):645-651.
[28]李宁,白冰,鲁长虎. 植物种群更新限制-从种子生产到幼树建成[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(21):6624-6632.
[29]方顺清,颜建法,翁琴,等. 宜兴龙池山自然保护区银缕梅种群生态现状及保护研究[J]. 江苏林业科技,2004,31(2):4-5.
[30]MONSON,RUSSELL K. Ecology and the environment plant biodiversity and population dynamics[M]. New York:Springer,2014.
[31]陈远征,马祥庆,冯丽贞,等. 濒危植物沉水樟的种群生命表和谱分析[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(12):4267-4272.
[32]何中声,刘金福,洪伟,等. 中亚热带格氏栲天然林幼苗竞争强度研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2011,19(3):230-236.
[33]王晨晖. 浙江天目山金钱松自然群落特征及种群动态研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2014.
[34]宋庆妮,杨清培,王兵,等. 水分变化对毛竹林与常绿阔叶林土壤N素矿化的潜在影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3297-3304.
[35]廖文芳,夏念和,邓云飞,等. 华木莲的遗传多样性研究[J]. 云南植物研究,2004,26(1):58-64.
[36]邱珊姗. 华木莲sgSRK基因在自交不亲和反应中作用的初步研究[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2021.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-12-15