«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:

2024年04期

Page:

148-156

Research Field:

体育学

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

The "Ideal Rule" and the "Difficulties of Reality": Textual Characteristics and Optimization Path of China's Physical and Health Integration Policies from the Perspective of Policy Instruments

Author(s):

Li Fanghui¹; He Jiahan¹; Cui Bowen¹; Yan Shizhan²

(1.School of Sports Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China)
(2.Jiangsu Institute of Sports Science,Nanjing 210023,China)

Keywords:

policy tools; sports and health integration; content analysis method; Healthy China

PACS:

G804.8

DOI:

10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.04.016

Abstract:

Health and health integration policy tool is an important means to fundamentally break the development bottleneck of health and health integration under the healthy China strategy,and is also a necessary way to scientifically and reasonably build a health and health integration policy system. By using literature,content analysis,statistical analysis and other research methods,58 physical and health integration policy texts issued from 2016 to 2022 were taken as samples,a two-dimensional three-dimensional analysis framework was constructed from the dimension of policy tools and development factors,and a quantitative analysis of physical and health integration policies was conducted through screening statistics and coding. The research finds that there are still some practical problems in health integration policy,such as the unbalanced proportion of policy tools used in policy texts,the bias of policy tools in different development factors,the insufficient vertical extension of policy system impeding the overall process of integration practice,and the uneven horizontal expansion of policy system leading to regional and urban-rural differences. Therefore,the following optimization strategies are proposed:optimize the combination of policy tools to enhance the scientificity of policies; balance the proportion of development factors to promote all-round development; strengthen cross-departmental and cross-level coordination and interaction,and promote integration practice to go deeper; establish a dynamic monitoring and evaluation mechanism to balance differences between different regions and between urban and rural areas.

References:

[1]李彦龙,陈德明,聂应军,等. 场域论视域下我国体医融合的实然困境与应然进路[J]. 体育学研究,2021,35(1):36-43.
[2]杨继星,陈家起. 体医融合的制约因素分析及路径构建[J]. 体育文化导刊,2019(4):18-23.
[3]刘晴,王世强,黄晶. 基于钻石模型理论的我国体医融合健康促进服务发展研究[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报,2022,41(3):1-7.
[4]刘海平,汪洪波. “体医融合”促进全民健康的分析与思考[J]. 首都体育学院学报,2019,31(5):454-458.
[5]常娟,林姝洁,李科. 政策工具视角下我国全民健身政策文本特征研究[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报,2021,40(4):42-49.
[6]王辉.政策工具视角下我国养老服务业政策研究[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究,2015(2):83-89.
[7]何强,陈菲,王映红,等. 基于政策工具视角的我国老年健康服务业政策分析[J]. 医学与社会,2020,33(6):47-52.
[8]芦胜男,刘冬磊,王子朴. 基于政策工具视角下我国体育消费政策分析——基于37份国家政策文本的内容分析(2014-2019)[J]. 武汉体育学院学报,2021,55(1):51-58.
[9]聂应军,赵元吉,郑湘平,等. 我国体医融合高质量发展的多维逻辑、影响因素及实践路径[J]. 体育学刊,2022,29(3):40-50.
[10]余守文,肖乐乐. 政策工具视角下中国体育产业政策文本量化分析——以国务院46号文为例[J]. 体育学刊,2018,25(4):21-27.
[11]朱双双,郑国华,蒋健保. 新发展理念视域下体医融合的路径选择[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报,2022,41(2):55-62.
[12]张文鹏,王健. 新中国成立以来学校体育政策的演进:基于政策文本的研究[J]. 体育科学,2015,35(2):14-23.
[13]何茄菡,崔博文,李方晖,等. 体卫融合服务开展的限制性因素分析——基于扎根理论的案例研究[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2024,41(2):231-236.
[14]张阳,吴友良. 健康中国战略下体医融合的实践成效、困境与推进策略[J]. 中国体育科技,2022,58(1):109-113.
[15]崔博文,李方晖,王静,等. 体卫融合高质量发展的时代价值、内在机理与实践路径[J]. 卫生经济研究,2023,40(7):9-12+16.
[16]杨莹莹,方慧,陈召,等. 数字赋能社区体卫融合高质量发展:场域困境与纾解方略[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报,2023,42(6):81-87.
[17]薛欣,徐福振,郭建军. 我国体医融合推行现状及政策问题确认研究[J]. 体育学研究,2021,35(1):20-28.
[18]卢文云,陈佩杰. 全民健身与全民健康深度融合的内涵、路径与体制机制研究[J]. 体育科学,2018,38(5):25-39+55.
[19]姜桂萍,李良,吴雪萍.我国体卫融合发展的历史脉络和现实困境及其疏解策略[J]. 体育学刊,2023,30(1):47-53.
[20]周红妹,林向阳. 政策工具视角下地方政府对国家体育产业政策的再制定[J]. 上海体育学院学报,2017,41(3):9-16.
[21]吕宗南,李哲,杨光.新时代新征程体卫融合健康服务的发展困境、理想形态与现实进路[J]. 沈阳体育学院学报,2023,42(6):88-94.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2024-12-15