[1]许正铎,廖凌云,兰思仁.流域尺度荒野地格局特征与保护空缺分析——以闽江流域为例[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2023,46(03):79-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.03.011]
　Xu Zhengduo,Liao Lingyun,Lan Siren.Analysis of Wilderness Areas Pattern Characteristics and Conservation Vacancies in the Minjiang River Basin[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2023,46(03):79-88.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.03.011]
点击复制

流域尺度荒野地格局特征与保护空缺分析——以闽江流域为例()
分享到：

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
第46卷
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
79-88
栏目:
生态学
出版日期:
2023-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Wilderness Areas Pattern Characteristics and Conservation Vacancies in the Minjiang River Basin
文章编号:
1001-4616(2023)03-0079-10
作者:
许正铎1; 廖凌云1; 3; 兰思仁1; 2; 3
(1.福建农林大学风景园林与艺术学院,福建 福州 350108)
(2.国家林业与草原局森林公园工程技术研究中心,福建 福州 350002)
(3.武夷山国家公园研究院,福建 福州 350002)
Author(s):
Xu Zhengduo1; Liao Lingyun1; 3; Lan Siren1; 2; 3
(1.College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
(2.Engineering Technology Center for Forest Park,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Fuzhou 350002,China)
(3.Wuyishan National
关键词:
风景园林; 荒野地; 荒野制图; 荒野保护; 闽江流域
Keywords:
landscape architecture;  wilderness areas;  wilderness mapping;  wilderness protection;  Minjiang River basin
分类号:
X321
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.03.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
荒野地是自然生态系统最后的避难所,对于区域生物多样性保护起到了关键作用. 流域作为人类活动与经济发展的重心,探究流域尺度荒野地分布对于推动流域整体生态保护与高质量发展有着重要的意义. 本研究以东南沿海地区的闽江流域为例,利用综合荒野制图法,识别流域范围内荒野地空间分布、格局特征、保护现状与保护空缺. 研究结果表明:(1)闽江流域现存荒野地共计5 922.33 km2,占流域总面积的6.9%. 荒野地主要位于植被覆盖密集、海拔较高、地形险峻的地区,总体表现为上游多、下游少的分布特征.(2)研究区域内荒野地破碎化情况严重. 小型荒野地是主要的荒野地类型,大型荒野地目前仅存2处,位于武夷山自然保护地群内,且尚未被保护地范围所完全覆盖.(3)低质量荒野地、中质量荒野地、高质量荒野地面积比例分别为5.2%、51.7%、43.1%; 中高质量荒野地是闽江流域荒野地的主要构成部分,高海拔区域分布有更多的高质量荒野.(4)闽江流域荒野地存在大面积保护空缺,约有74%的荒野地尚处于保护地范围之外,部分荒野地未能得到完整保护. 研究揭示了闽江流域荒野地分布与保护空缺,以期为流域生态文明建设提供支持和政策建议.
Abstract:
Wilderness areas are the last refuge of natural ecosystems and play a key role in regional biodiversity conservation. As the center of human activities and economic development,it is important to investigate the distribution of wilderness at the watershed scale to promote the overall ecological protection and high-quality development of the watershed. In this study,the Min River watershed in the southeast coastal region was used as an example to identify the spatial distribution,pattern characteristics,conservation status and conservation vacancies of wilderness areas in the watershed scale by using the integrated wilderness mapping method. The results of the study show that,1. 5 922.33 km2 of wilderness exists in the Minjiang River Basin,accounting for 6.9% of the basin's total area,and wilderness generally shows the distribution characteristics of more in the upstream basin and less in the downstream basin. The wilderness areas are mainly located in areas with dense vegetation cover,high elevation,and treacherous terrain. 2. Small wilderness areas are the main type of wilderness. Only two large wilderness areas are remaining,which are located within the Wuyishan protected areas group and are not yet fully covered by the protected areas. 3. The proportion of low-quality wilderness land,medium-quality wilderness land,and high-quality wilderness land are 5.2%,51.7%,and 43.1%,respectively. High-quality wilderness land is the main component of wilderness land in Minjiang River Basin,and more high-quality wilderness is distributed in high altitude areas. 4. The protection gap of wilderness in Minjiang River Basin is serious,about 74% of the wilderness areas are still outside the scope of the protected areas,and some of the wilderness are not completely protected. The study reveals the distribution and protection gaps of wilderness in the Minjiang River Basin,with a view to providing support and policy recommendations for the construction of ecological civilization in the basin.

参考文献/References:

[1]DI MARCO M,FERRIER S,HARWOOD T D,et al. Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity[J]. Nature,2019,573(7775):582-585.
[2]WATSON J E M,SHANAHAN D F,DI MARCO M,et al. Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets[J]. Current biology,2016,26(21):2929-2934.
[3]JONES K R,KLEIN C J,HALPERN B S,et al. The location and protection status of earth's diminishing marine wilderness[J]. Current biology,2018,28(16):2683.
[4]BUTCHART S H M,WALPOLE M,COLLEN B,et al. Global biodiversity:indicators of recent declines[J]. Science,2010,328(5982):1164-1168.
[5]FAHRIG L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity[J]. Annual review of ecology,evolution,and systematics,2003,34:487-515.
[6]JONES K R,VENTER O,FULLER R A,et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure[J]. Science,2018,360(6390):788-791.
[7]CAO Y,CARVER S,YANG R. Mapping wilderness in China:comparing and integrating boolean and WLC approaches[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2019,192:103636.
[8]VENTER O,SANDERSON E W,MAGRACH A,et al. Global terrestrial human footprint maps for 1993 and 2009[J]. Scientific data,2016,3(1):160067.
[9]SANDERSON E W,JAITEH M,LEVY M A,et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild:the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface,which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature,whether we like it or not[J]. BioScience,2002,52(10):891-904.
[10]VENTER O,SANDERSON E W,MAGRACH A,et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation[J]. Nature communications,2016,7(1):12558.
[11]JACOBSON A P,RIGGIO J M,TAIT A,et al. Global areas of low human impact(‘Low Impact Areas')and fragmentation of the natural world[J]. Scientific reports,2019,9(1):14179.
[12]MCCLOSKEY J M,SPALDING H. A reconnaissance-level inventory of the amount of wilderness remaining in the world[J]. Ambio,1989,18(4):221-227.
[13]CARVER S,COMBER A,MCMORRAN R,et al. A GIS model for mapping spatial patterns and distribution of wild land in Scotland[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2012,104(3/4):395-409.
[14]CARVER S,EVANS A,FRITZ S. Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom[J]. International journal of wilderness,2002,8(1):24-29.
[15]ÓLAFSDÓTTIR R,RUNNSTRÖM M C. How wild is iceland?Wilderness quality with respect to nature-based tourism[J]. Tourism geographies,2011,13(2):280-298.
[16]MÜLLER A,BØCHER P K,SVENNING J C. Where are the wilder parts of anthropogenic landscapes?A mapping case study for Denmark[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2015,144:90-102.
[17]ORSI F,GENELETTI D,BORSDORF A. Mapping wildness for protected area management:A methodological approach and application to the Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site(Italy)[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2013,120:1-15.
[18]KLISKEY A D,KEARSLEY G W. Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern New Zealand[J]. Applied geography,1993,13(3):203-223.
[19]RADFORD S L,SENN J,KIENAST F. Indicator-based assessment of wilderness quality in mountain landscapes[J]. Ecological indicators,2019,97:438-446.
[20]MA S,LONG Y. Mapping potential wilderness in China with location-based services data[J]. Applied spatial analysis and policy,2020,13(1):69-89.
[21]李晓雪,廖凌云,兰思仁. 福建省荒野地空间分布研究[J]. 陕西林业科技,2021,49(5):20-27.
[22]左翔,韩旭,陈静,等. 大理市荒野格局分析[J]. 中国园林,2019,35(11):108-112.
[23]左翔,彭树芳,彭建松. 曲靖市马龙区荒野格局分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,40(1):124-131.
[24]徐博,张云.“荒野智慧”下滇南边境热带森林生态保护空间布局优化研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(7):851-859.
[25]CAO Y,WANG F,TSENG T H,et al. Identifying ecosystem service value and potential loss of wilderness areas in China to support post-2020 global biodiversity conservation[J]. Science of the total environment,2022,846:157348.
[26]CAO Y,YANG R,CARVER S. Linking wilderness mapping and connectivity modelling:A methodological framework for wildland network planning[J]. Biological conservation,2020,251:108679.
[27]XU B,ZHANG Y,LIN W. A connectivity modeling and evaluating methodological framework in biodiversity hotspots based on naturalness and linking wilderness[J]. Conservation science and practice,2022,4(8):e12750.
[28]曹越,龙瀛,杨锐. 中国大陆国土尺度荒野地识别与空间分布研究[J]. 中国园林,2017,33(6):26-33.
[29]LIN S,WU R,HUA C,et al. Identifying local-scale wilderness for on-ground conservation actions within a global biodiversity hotspot[J]. Scientific reports,2016,6(1):25898.
[30]BAI Y,JIANG B,ALATALO J M,et al. Impacts of land management on ecosystem service delivery in the Baiyangdian River Basin[J]. Environmental earth sciences,2016,75(3):258.
[31]郭晓英,陈兴伟,陈莹,等. 气候变化与人类活动对闽江流域径流变化的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2016,14(2):88-94.
[32]严绍裕,刘爽. 闽江流域典型自然保护区森林丧失的时空动态分析[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2020,47(6):949-954.
[33]应凌霄,王军,周妍. 闽江流域生态安全格局及其生态保护修复措施[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(23):8857-8866.
[34]白健,刘健,余坤勇,等. 基于InVEST-Biodiversity模型的闽江流域生境质量十年变化评价[J]. 林业勘察设计,2015(2):5-12.
[35]王军,严有龙,王金满,等. 闽江流域生境质量时空变化特征与预测研究[J]. 生态学报,2021(14):5837-5848.
[36]兰紫橙,贾岚,程煜. 闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(12):3909-3920.
[37]CASSON S A,MARTIN V G,WATSON A,et al. Wilderness protected areas:management guidelines for IUCN Category 1b protected areas. [J]. Best practice protected area guidelines series,2016(25):36-42.
[38]谢余初,巩杰,钱大文,等. 国道312酒泉——嘉峪关段公路沿线景观格局变化[J]. 干旱区研究,2013,30(6):1056-1063.
[39]ZHANG S,ZHONG Q,CHENG D,et al. Coupling coordination analysis and prediction of landscape ecological risks and ecosystem services in the Min River Basin[J]. Land,2022,11(2):222.
[40]易灿,张智,王文奎,等. 福建地区自然保护区内的生态修复探索与实践——以福建闽清黄楮林自然保护区石潭溪片区生态修复项目为例[J]. 中国园林,2021,37(9):89-94.
[41]王文奎,牟宇峰,蒋艳君,等. 生命共同体理念下的浅山沿海地区生态保护修复顶层设计探析——以闽江流域(福州段)为例[J]. 规划师,2020,36(23):44-49.
[42]朱润苗,陈松林. 1980—2020年福建省景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值的空间关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(6):1599-1607.
[43]曹越,张振威,杨锐. 生态文明建设背景下的中国荒野保护策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,17(4):93-99.
[44]严有龙,王军,王金满. 基于生态系统服务的闽江流域生态补偿阈值研究[J]. 中国土地科学,2021,35(3):97-106.
[45]张雪,池梦薇,兰思仁,等. 福建省自然保护地边界交叉重叠的格局特征[J]. 风景园林,2021,28(8):106-112.
[46]曹越,杨锐. 2020年后全球生物多样性框架下中国荒野地的系统性保护策略[J]. 中国园林,2022,38(8):6-9.
[47]吴承照,欧阳燕菁,潘维琪,等. 国家公园划定荒野保护区的意义与方法[J]. 中国园林,2022,38(8):10-15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-02-07.
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(19BJY048)、福建省自然科学基金项目(2022J0613)、福建农林大学杰出青年计划项目(XJQ201932).
通讯作者:许正铎,硕士,研究方向:国家公园与自然保护地相关研究. E-mail:xzd199711.fafu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-15