[1]赵 晴,江昕阳,任传堂,等.中国高新技术产品出口“一带一路”沿线国家的格局与影响因素[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2024,(03):32-41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.03.005]
　Zhao Qing,Jiang Xinyang,Ren Chuantang,et al.The Pattern and Influencing Factors of China's High-Tech Products Export to Countries Along the Belt and Road[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2024,(03):32-41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.03.005]
点击复制

中国高新技术产品出口“一带一路”沿线国家的格局与影响因素()
分享到：

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
32-41
栏目:
地理学
出版日期:
2024-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Pattern and Influencing Factors of China's High-Tech Products Export to Countries Along the Belt and Road
文章编号:
1001-4616(2024)03-0032-10
作者:
赵 晴1; 江昕阳1; 任传堂1; 汪 涛1; 2
(1.南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)
(2.江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210023)
Author(s):
Zhao Qing1; Jiang Xinyang1; Ren Chuantang1; Wang Tao1; 2
(1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
(2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing 210023,China)
关键词:
高新技术产品; 出口; 二模网络; 社会网络分析; “一带一路”
Keywords:
high-tech products; export; two-mode network; social network analysis; the Belt and Road
分类号:
K902
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2024.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于2007—2020年中国31个省份高新技术产品出口数据,构建“省-国”二模网络,分析各省份对“一带一路”沿线国家高新技术产品出口的时空演变,并使用Tobit模型分析各省份网络地位的影响因素. 结果表明:(1)高新技术产品出口规模总体增长、轻微波动,广东、江苏等是高新技术产品出口大省. 各省份出口目的地以东南亚国家为主,出口产品类型以计算机与通信技术类为主.(2)高新技术产品出口网络的广度与深度不断拓展,网络呈现出明显的核心-边缘特征,其中东部省份出口比较优势更强.(3)产业集聚水平、外商直接投资、外贸环境、研发创新能力对度数中心度或接近中心度主要产生正向影响,产业集聚水平、外商直接投资、外贸环境、友好城市关系对中间中心度主要产生正向影响. 东部和非东部省份的影响因素存在一定的差异性.
Abstract:
Based on the high-tech products export data of 31 provinces in China from 2007 to 2020,this paper constructed a "province-country" two-mode network to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of high-tech products exported from provinces to countries along the Belt and Road,and utilized Tobit model to analyze the factors influencing the network status of provinces. The results show that:(1)There has been a general increase with slight fluctuations in the export scale of high-tech products,with Guangdong Province and Jiangsu Province are the major exporters. The export destinations of each province are mainly Southeast Asian countries,and the export product types are mainly computers and communication technologies.(2)There is a continuing expansion of the breadth and depth,displaying a core-peripheral structure. The eastern provinces have stronger comparative export advantages.(3)Industrial agglomeration level,foreign direct investment,foreign trade environment,and research and development(R&D)capability mainly have positive impacts on the degree centrality or closeness centrality,while industrial agglomeration level,foreign direct investment,foreign trade environment,and friendship city relationship mainly have positive impacts on the betweenness centrality. Furthermore,there are some differences between the influencing factors in eastern and non-eastern provinces.

参考文献/References:

[1]赵家章,丁国宁.“双循环”新发展格局下中国高新技术产品贸易困境与策略选择[J]. 国际贸易,2021(11):31-43.
[2]涂庆丰,雷靖雯. 高新技术产品出口对中国产业结构升级的内在作用机制:基于中介效应的实证检验[J]. 经营与管理,2022(11):180-186.
[3]段德忠,杜德斌. 全球高科技产品贸易结构演化及影响因素[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(12):2759-2776.
[4]李恩康,陈娱,牛博. 全球各国出口相似度格局与演化特征[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2021,44(1):50-56.
[5]ZUO X G,ZHU X H,CHEN J Y. Trade dependence network structure of tantalum trade goods and its effect on trade prices:an industry chain perspective[J]. Resources policy,2022,79:103065.
[6]DUAN D Z,XIA Q F. From the United States to China?A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic-telecommunications[J]. Growth and change,2022,53(2):823-847.
[7]LOYE J,LEONARDO E,SHEPELYANSKY D L. World impact of kernel European Union 9 countries from Google matrix analysis of the world trade network[J]. Applied network science,2021,6:37.
[8]ZHU N,HUANG S Y. Impact of the tariff concessions of the RCEP agreement on the structure and evolution mechanism of manufacturing trade networks[J]. Social networks,2023,74:78-101.
[9]BENKOVSKIS K,JULIA W. Non-price competitiveness of exports from emerging countries[J]. Empirical economics,2016,51(2):707-735.
[10]陈韬,贺灿飞. 国际贸易地理研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(10):1732-1746.
[11]赵蕾,韦素琼,游小珺. 基于SNA的全球电子信息制造业贸易网络演化特征及机理研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2021,30(4):708-720.
[12]程中海,屠颜颍,孙红雪. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家制造业产业内贸易网络时空特征及影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2022,31(3):478-489.
[13]庄德林,李嘉豪,陈紫若,等. 全球稀土贸易网络的动态演变与影响机制:基于产业链的视角[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(11):1900-1911.
[14]吴婉金,贺灿飞. 中国纺织业出口贸易网络扩张[J]. 世界地理研究,2022,31(1):12-28.
[15]彭飞,胡锦琳,伏捷,等. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线国家水产品贸易网络分析[J]. 热带地理,2021,41(6):1188-1198.
[16]谭丹,马顺甜. 大豆国际贸易格局演化与中国对策[J]. 经济地理,2022,42(9):110-119.
[17]XIA Q F,DU D B,CAO W P,et al. Who is the core?Reveal the heterogeneity of global rare earth trade structure from the perspective of industrial chain[J]. Resources policy,2023,82:103532.
[18]蒋小荣,杨永春,汪胜兰. 甘肃省面向“一带一路”沿线出口贸易格局演变及其影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究,2020,29(5):1029-1039.
[19]齐放,贺灿飞,张玮. 中国省区出口贸易地理格局演变与贸易网络拓展[J]. 经济地理,2021,41(2):35-46.
[20]章屹祯,汪涛,曹卫东,等. 全球视野下区域协调发展的经济地理学研究:进展与展望[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2020,43(3):78-83.
[21]刘卫东.“一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展,2015,34(5):538-544.
[22]LIU C L,XU J Q,ZHANG H. Competitiveness or complementarity?A dynamic network analysis of international agri-trade along the Belt and Road[J]. Applied spatial analysis and policy,2019,13:349-374.
[23]裴天舒. 创新能力对我国向“一带一路”沿线国家出口高新技术产品的影响[D]. 济南:山东大学,2020.
[24]魏龙,李丽娟. 技术创新对中国高技术产品出口影响的实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题,2005(12):32-34.
[25]冯德连,韩宁. 长江经济带高新技术产业出口的空间特征与影响因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究,2018(11):51-62.
[26]ZHENG D,KURODA T. The impact of economic policy on industrial specialization and regional concentration of China's high-tech industries[J]. The annals of regional science,2013,50(3):771-790.
[27]李亚婷,潘少奇,苗长虹. 中原经济区县际经济联系网络结构及其演化特征[J]. 地理研究,2014,33(7):1239-1250.
[28]DILEK G D,MELTEM I Y. Network analysis of international export pattern[J]. Social network analysis and mining,2022,12(1):156.
[29]肖凡,任建造,伍敏冬,等. 21世纪以来中国高新技术企业的时空分布和影响机制[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(2):27-34.
[30]陈汉欣. 中国沿海地区高新技术产业发展的若干问题[J]. 经济地理,2003,23(6):731-737.
[31]黎逸科,黎碧茵. 广东产业集聚区发展状况浅析[J]. 热带地理,2008,28(4):357-362.
[32]肖凡,王姣娥,黄宇金,等. 中国高新技术企业分布影响因素的空间异质性与尺度效应[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(5):1338-1351.
[33]张建伟,王艳华,赵建吉,等. 产业转移与创新能力互动机制的研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究,2016,25(3):133-141.
[34]TU W J,ZHANG L X,SUN D Y,et al. Evaluating high-tech industries' technological innovation capability and spatial pattern evolution characteristics:evidence from China[J]. Journal of innovation & knowledge,2023,8(1):100287.
[35]凌丹,邹梦婷. 金融支持、研发创新与出口复杂度:基于中国高新技术产业价值链的分析[J]. 技术经济,2020,39(11):77-86.
[36]SONG Y R,YU C J,HAO L L,et al. Path for China's high-tech industry to participate in the reconstruction of global value chains[J]. Technology in society,2021,65:101486.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-06-05.
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(42271183)、江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目(2020SJZDA135).
通讯作者:汪涛,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:高新技术产业的技术扩散、区域高新技术集群、创新经济地理等. E-mail:wangtao@njnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-15