[1]胡琼文,游宁龙,霍伟伟,等.生活性街道绿色空间对老年人社会交往的影响研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2025,48(02):139-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.02.014]
　Hu Qiongwen,You Ninglong,Huo Weiwei,et al.The Influence of Green Space in Living Street on the Social Interaction of the Elderly[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2025,48(02):139-148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.02.014]
点击复制

生活性街道绿色空间对老年人社会交往的影响研究()

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
48
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
139-148
栏目:
环境科学与工程
出版日期:
2025-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Influence of Green Space in Living Street on the Social Interaction of the Elderly
文章编号:
1001-4616(2025)02-0139-10
作者:
胡琼文; 游宁龙; 霍伟伟; 杨彬鸿; 董 妍
(福建农林大学风景园林与艺术学院,福建 福州 350100)
Author(s):
Hu Qiongwen; You Ninglong; Huo Weiwei; Yang Binhong; Dong Yan
(College of Landscape Architecture and Art,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350100,China)
关键词:
老年人; 生活性街道; 绿色空间; 社会交往; 适老化环境
Keywords:
the elderly; living street; green space; social interaction; elderly-friendly environment
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.02.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
绿色空间对促进老年人社会交往和推动城市适老化环境建设具有重要意义. 当前文献较少关注老年人高频使用的生活性街道绿色空间,尤其对生活性街道绿色空间特征对老年人社会交往的影响尚缺乏深入研究. 选取福州市中心城区6条典型生活性街道为对象,从客观和感知角度对其绿色空间特征进行量化,并结合问卷调查、SEM结构方程模型法和中介效应模型等方法,分析生活性街道绿色空间特征对老年人社会交往的影响. 结果显示:(1)生活性街道的客观绿色空间特征在影响老年人的社会交往周时长中发挥主要作用,尤其是相对空间垂直绿量(β=0.54,p<0.01)、植物与建筑空间协调度(β=0.36,p<0.01)、可活动空间面积(β=0.46,p<0.01)等指标具有显著积极影响;(2)老年人的社会交往周时长与街道植物类型(β=0.94,p<0.01)、街道植物色彩(β=0.93,p<0.01)、街道绿色空间小气候(β=0.92,p<0.01)等感知绿色空间特征也呈现显著相关性;(3)在客观绿色空间特征影响老年人社会交往的过程中,感知绿色空间特征发挥了16.1%的中介作用.
Abstract:
Green spaces are of great significance in promoting daily social interaction among the elderly and advancing the construction of an aging friendly urban environment. Current literature has paid little attention to the high-frequency use of green spaces in residential streets by the elderly,and there is a lack of in-depth research on the impact of the characteristics of green spaces in residential streets on social interaction among the elderly. Selecting six typical residential streets in the central urban area of Fuzhou as objects,quantifying their green space characteristics from both objective and perceptual perspectives,and combining methods such as questionnaire surveys,SEM structural equation modeling,and mediation effect models,analyzing the impact path of green space characteristics of residential streets on social interaction among the elderly. The results show that(1)The objective green space characteristics of living streets play a predominant role in influencing the weekly social interaction duration of older adults. Specifically,metrics such as relative spatial vertical green volume(β=0.54,p<0.01),plant-building spatial coordination(β=0.36,p<0.01),and activity space area(β=0.46,p<0.01)exhibit significant positive effects.(2)The weekly social interaction duration of older adults also demonstrates significant correlations with perceived green space characteristics,including street plant diversity(β=0.94,p<0.01),vegetation color richness(β=0.93,p<0.01),and microclimate comfort(β=0.92,p<0.01).(3)In the process of objective green space characteristics influencing social interactions among older adults,perceived green space characteristics exert a partial mediating role,accounting for 16.1% of the total effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]LATKIN C A,CURRY A D. Stressful neighborhoods and depression:a prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder[J]. Journal of health and social behavior,2003,44(1):34-44.
[2]于一凡. 建成环境对老年人健康的影响:认识基础与方法探讨[J]. 国际城市规划,2020,35(1):1-7.
[3]张金光,余兆武,赵兵. 城市绿地促进人群健康的作用途径:理论框架与实践启示[J]. 景观设计学,2020,8(4):104-113.
[4]CACKOWSKI J M,NASAR J L. The restorative effects of roadside vegetation:implications for automobile driver anger and frustration[J]. Environment and behavior,2003,35(6):736-751.
[5]史祎雯,朱喜钢,孙洁. 绿色开放空间对老年人不同社会交往活动的影响研究:以南京市为例[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2022,37(4):62-68.
[6]YUNGM E H K,CONEJOS S,CHAN E H W. Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open space in urban renewal[J]. Cities,2016,52:114-122.
[7]WOLF J H,BRESLAU N,FORD A B,et al. A ward. distance and contacts:interactions of black urban elderly adults with family and friends[J]. Journal of gerontology,1983,38(4):465-471.
[8]PASAOGULLARI N,DORATLI N. Measuring accessibility and utilization of public space in Famagusta[J]. Cities,2004,21(3):225-232.
[9]MARKEVYCH I,SCHOIERER J,HARTIG T,et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health:theoretical and methodological guidance[J]. Environmental research,2017,158:301-317.
[10]姝伊,郑曦. 促进身心健康:社区公共空间对社会凝聚力影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2021,28(2):117-124.
[11]CERIN E,LEE K Y,BARNETT A,et al. Objectively-measured neighborhood environments and leisure-time physical activity in Chinese urban elders[J]. Preventive medicine,2013,56(1):86-89.
[12]ERTEL K A,GLYMOUR M M,BERKMAN L F. Effects of social integration on preserving memory function in a nationally representative US elderly population[J]. American journal of public health,2008,98(7):1215-1220.
[13]姜玉培,甄峰,孙鸿鹄,等. 健康视角下城市建成环境对老年人日常步行活动的影响研究[J]. 地理研究,2020,39(3):570-584.
[14]ESTER O,ROBYNNE S,NICO D,et al. Residential surrounding greenness,self-rated health and interrelations with aspects of neighborhood environment and social relations[J]. Journal of urban health,2017,94:158-169.
[15]李经纬,范晨璟,田莉,等. 社区建成环境对老年人社会交往活动的影响研究[J]. 人文地理,2021,36(1):56-65.
[16]庄旖旎,陈丹,车生泉. 城市居住环境植物景观特征对老年群体社交行为影响研究:以上海虹口区为例[J]. 中国园林,2021,37(10):83-88.
[17]郑凌予,杨淑梅,伍夏,等. 基于空间感知的社区绿色暴露指数对活动行为影响研究[J]. 中国园林,2023,39(1):92-97.
[18]史祎雯,朱喜钢,孙洁. 绿色开放空间对老年人不同社会交往活动的影响研究:以南京市为例[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2022,37(4):62-68.
[19]谭少华,何琪潇,陈璐瑶,等. 城市公园环境对老年人日常交往活动的影响研究[J]. 中国园林,2020,36(4):44-48.
[20]EWING R,CERVERO R. Travel and the built environment:a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,2010,76(3),265-294.
[21]DADVAND P,NIEUWENHUIJSEN M J,ESNAOLA M. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(PNAS),2019,116(24):11859-11867.
[22]KWEON B S,SULLIVAN W C,WILEY A R. Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults[J]. Environment and behavior,1998,30(6):832-858.
[23]杨茗涵,黄晓军,赵凯旭,等. 体力活动视角下城市绿色空间与居民健康研究进展与展望[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2023,38(6):46-53.
[24]胡玉婷,于一凡,张庆来. 绿色开放空间对老年人社会交往的影响及其环境特征研究:基于上海市杨浦区公房社区的调查[J]. 上海城市规划,2021(2):96-103.
[25]SAMSUDIN R,YOK T P,CHUA V. Social capital formation in high density urban environments:perceived attributes of neighborhood green space shape social capital more directly than physical ones[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2022,227:104527.
[26]张舒怡,林赛南,李志刚,等. 邻里环境感知对中国城市居民自评健康影响研究:以武汉市为例[J]. 人文地理,2019,34(2):32-40.
[27]董禹,李珍,董慰. 生活性街道环境感知特征对居民心理健康的影响:哈尔滨市老城区的实证研究[J]. 中国园林,2021,37(11):45-50.
[28]应君,金荷仙,张一奇,等. 基于社区绿地的流动人口社会融合之道:以社会交往、地方依恋为中介[J]. 中国园林,2024,40(11):104-109.
[29]CATTELL V,DINES N,GESLER W,et al. Mingling,observing,and lingering:everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations[J]. Health & place,2008,14(4),544-561.
[30]HUANG Z,LI X,LI W. Investigation of urban green space equity at the city level and relevant strategies for improving the provisioning in China[J]. Sustainability,2021,13(4),292.
[31]WU W. Intergenerational public space design and policy:a review of the literature[J]. Journal of aging & social policy,2020,32(4),365-384.
[32]MOURATIDIS K,POORTINGA W. Built environment,urban vitality and social cohesion:do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities?[J]. Landscape and urban planning,2020,204:103951.
[33]FONT X,GARAY L,JONES S. A social cognitive theory of sustainability empathy[J]. Annals of tourism research,2016,58:65-80.
[34]黄思颖,傅伟聪,刘群阅,等. 福州城市绿地场所感知与场所依恋知觉关系[J]. 中国城市林业,2022,20(4):110-115.
[35]郑凌予,王华嵩,伍夏,等. 基于邻里空间感知的老年人群绿地活动水平比较研究:以重庆典型社区为例[J]. 园林,2022,39(8):45-52.
[36]董慰,王乃迪,董禹,等. 日常活动地绿地感知与居民主观幸福感的关系:以哈尔滨香坊老工业区为例[J]. 风景园林,2021,28(5):23-29.
[37]陈一凡,陈爽. 绿地感知质量对“老漂族”社区归属感的作用机制:基于南京典型住区的实证研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2024:1-18.
[38]WILHELMSEN C K,SKALLEBERG K,RAANAAS R K,et al. Associations between green area in school neighbourhoods and overweight and obesity among Norwegian adolescents[J]. Preventive medicine reports,2017,7:99-105.
[39]冯建喜,黄旭,汤爽爽. 客观与主观建成环境对老年人不同体力活动影响机制研究:以南京为例[J]. 上海城市规划,2017(3):17-23.
[40]黄丹,戴冬晖. 生活性街道构成要素对活力的影响:以深圳典型街道为例[J]. 中国园林,2019,35(9):89-94.
[41]方榕,刘碧玉. 生活性街道的形态规律及其动因研究:以南京为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2022,29(12):129-136.
[42]郭璇,朱济友,徐程扬,等. 类型与结构对北京市居住区宅旁绿色空间质量的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2022,44(5):55-68.
[43]姝伊,郑曦. 促进身心健康:社区公共空间对社会凝聚力影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2021,28(2):117-124.
[44]LYNCH K. The image of the city[M]. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1960.
[45]WANG Y,LI X,CHEN H. Urban street vitality evaluation based on street-level indicators:a case study in Hangzhou[J]. Cities,2021,115:103229.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 静,李方晖,高珂珂,等.跨理论模型在老年人体力活动促进健康中的应用研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2022,45(03):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2022.03.018]
　Wang Jing,Li Fanghui,Gao Keke,et al.Application of the Transtheoretical Model to Promoting Health in Physical Activity of the Elderly[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2022,45(02):141.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2022.03.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-12-18.
基金项目:福建省社会科学基金项目(FJ2023C034).
通讯作者:游宁龙,博士,副教授,研究方向:健康城市. E-mail:nlYou@fafu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-04-15