[1]彭 尧,吴 倩,陈燕菁,等.海水养殖空间规划研究进展[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2025,48(05):47-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.05.006]
　Peng Yao,Wu Qian,Chen Yanjing,et al.Progress in Mariculture Spatial Planning Research[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2025,48(05):47-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.05.006]
点击复制

海水养殖空间规划研究进展()

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
48
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
47-54
栏目:
海洋科学
出版日期:
2025-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Progress in Mariculture Spatial Planning Research
文章编号:
1001-4616(2025)05-0047-08
作者:
彭 尧1; 吴 倩2; 陈燕菁2; 杜 雯2
(1.中国长江三峡集团有限公司江苏分公司,江苏 南京 210019)
(2.南京师范大学海洋科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023)
Author(s):
Peng Yao1; Wu Qian2; Chen Yanjing2; Du Wen2
(1.China Three Gorges Corporation Jiangsu Branch, Nanjing 210019, China)
(2.College of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
关键词:
海水养殖; 冲突与协调; 容量评估; 空间选址规划
Keywords:
mariculture; conflict and coordination; capacity assessment; spatial site planning
分类号:
S931.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2025.05.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
受全球气温变化及人口激增的影响,海水养殖业得到空前的关注. 其规模不断扩大,造成来自社会、经济与自然环境的众多问题. 在拥挤的近岸沿海空间中,如何有效协调或缓解其他用海活动与海水养殖的冲突,实现利益相关者的权益保障,是当前海水养殖空间规划研究的重要方向. 本文围绕冲突协调、容量评估与空间选址三大核心议题,对相关文献进行综述与评析. 结果表明:(1)在空间冲突协调方面,共址和向深远海转移成为主要解决方案,但其广泛应用仍受限于政策壁垒与技术经济可行性;(2)在容量评估方面,虽已构建出包含物理、生产、生态、社会的多维评估体系,但全球标准化框架缺失,且现有模型难以内化复杂的利益相关者冲突;(3)在空间选址方面,多准则决策分析与地理信息系统结合是主流方法,但静态模型难以应对海洋环境的动态变化,亟需发展集成AI与大数据的动态规划工具. 未来海水养殖空间规划研究将向精细化、动态化和综合化方向发展. 深度融合多源数据、开发动态适应性模型并积极探索多用途用海模式,是实现海水养殖可持续发展、平衡生态保护与经济增长的关键. 本文可为相关领域的规划实践与研究创新提供理论参考.
Abstract:
Driven by global climate change and population explosion, the mariculture industry has received unprecedented attention. Its scale continues to expand, causing numerous social, economic, and natural environmental issues. In crowded near-shore coastal areas, effectively coordinating or mitigating conflicts between other sea-use activities and mariculture, while safeguarding the rights and interests of stakeholders, is a critical focus of current research on mariculture spatial planning. This paper systematically examines and analyzes related literatures centered on the three core issues:conflict coordination, capacity assessment, and spatial site selection. The results indicate that:(1)In spatial conflict coordination, co-location and relocation to offshore areas have emerged as primary solutions, yet their widespread application remains constrained by policy barriers and techno-economic feasibility.(2)Regarding capacity assessment, although a multi-dimensional evaluation system encompassing physical, production, ecological, and social aspects has been developed, a global standardized framework is absent, and existing models struggle to incorporate complex stakeholder conflicts.(3)For spatial site selection, the integration of multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA)with geographic information system(GIS)represents the mainstream methodology, but static models are inadequate for addressing the dynamic changes in the marine environment, urgently necessitating the development of dynamic planning tools that incorporate AI and big data. Future research in mariculture spatial planning will advance towards refinement, dynamism, and integration. Achieving sustainable mariculture development and balancing ecological conservation with economic growth hinge on the deep integration of multi-source data, the development of dynamic adaptive models, and the active exploration of multi-purpose sea-use patterns. This paper provides a theoretical reference for planning practices and research innovation in related fields.

参考文献/References:

[1]NAYLOR R L,HARDY R W,BUSCHMANN A H,et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture[J]. Nature,2021,591(7851):551-563.
[2]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2024[R]. Rome:FAO,2024.
[3]GENTRY R R,FROEHLICH H E,GRIMM D,et al. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture[J]. Nature ecology & evolution,2017,1(9):1317-1324.
[4]AGUILAR-MANJARREZ J,KAPETSKY J M,SOTO D. The potential of spatial planning tools to support the ecosystem approach to aquaculture[C]//Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Expert Workshop. Rome,2010.
[5]LESTER S E,STEVENS J M,GENTRY R R,et al. Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters[J]. Nature communications,2018,9:945.
[6]CROMEY C J,NICKELD T D,BLACK K D. DEPOMOD:modelling the deposition and biological effects of waste solids from marine cage farms[J]. Aquaculture,2002,214(1/4):211-239.
[7]PATRICIA M,GILBERT P M,MITRA A. From webs,loops,shunts,and pumps to microbial multitasking:evolving concepts of marine microbial ecology,the mixoplankton paradigm,and implications for a future ocean[J]. Limnology and oceanography,2022,67(3):585-597.
[8]MICHELLE N,SIMONE M N,VOPEL K. The need for proactive environmental management of offshore aquaculture[J]. Reviews in aquaculture,2024,16(2):603-607.
[9]FUJITA R,BRITTINGHAM P,CAO L,et al. Toward an environmentally responsible offshore aquaculture industry in the United States:ecological risks,remedies,and knowledge gaps[J]. Marine policy,2022,147:105351.
[10]BEARD K,KIMBLE M,YUAN J,et al. A method for heterogeneous spatio-temporal data integration in support of marine aquaculture site selection[J]. Journal of marine science and engineering,2020,8(2):96.
[11]KYRIAZI Z. From identification of compatibilities and conflicts to reaching marine spatial allocation agreements. Review of actions required and relevant tools and processes[J]. Ocean & coastal management,2018,166:103-112.
[12]LAGERVALID S,RÖCKMANN C,SCHOLL M. A study on the combination of offshore wind energy with offshore aquaculture[J]. Ocean & coastal management,2015,112:67-76.
[13]MAAR M,HOLBACH A,BODERSKOV T,et al. Multi-use of offshore wind farms with low-trophic aquaculture can help achieve global sustainability goals[J]. Communications earth & environment,2023,4:447.
[14]KANNEN A. Challenges for marine spatial planning in the context of multiple sea uses,policy arenas and actors based on experiences from the German North Sea[J]. Regional environmental change,2014,14(6):2139-2150.
[15]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022[R]. Rome:FAO,2022.
[16]Federal Government of Belgium. Marine spatial plan for the Belgian part of the North Sea[R]. Brussels:Federal Government of Belgium,2014.
[17]CARLOS V C W,BARBARA O,XABIER G,et al. Co-location opportunities for renewable energies and aquaculture facilities in the Canary Archipelago[J]. Ocean & coastal management,2018,166:62-71.
[18]LOVATELLI A,AGUILAR-MANJARREZ J,SOTO D. Expanding mariculture farther offshore:technical,environmental,spatial and governance challenges [R]. Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,2010.
[19]Det Norske Veritas. The future of ocean farming:aquaculture forecast to 2050 [R]. Høvik:Det Norske Veritas,2021.
[20]LONG L,LIU H,CUI M,et al. Offshore aquaculture in China[J]. Reviews in aquaculture,2024,16(1):254-270.
[21]RICHARD A C,JOSE A M,FABIO M,et al. Multi-stakeholder perspectives on spatial planning processes for mariculture in the Mediterranean and Black Sea[J]. Reviews in aquaculture,2020,12(1):347-364.
[22]ALEX H. The rocky path to sustainable fisheries management and conservation in the Galápagos Marine Reserve[J]. Ocean & coastal management,2008,51(9):567-574.
[23]JACEK Z,ANJA K. Engagement of stakeholders in the marine/maritime spatial planning process[J]. Marine policy,2021,132:103394.
[24]KUJALA J,SACHS S,LEINONEN H,et al. Stakeholder engagement:past,present,and future[J]. Business & society,2022,61(5):1136-1196.
[25]GOUVELLO R L,HOCHART L E,LAFFOLEY D,et al. Aquaculture and marine protected areas:potential opportunities and synergies[J]. Aquatic conservation:marine and freshwater ecosystems,2017,27(1):138-150.
[26]CARVER C E A,MALLET A L. Estimating the carrying capacity of a coastal inlet for mussel culture[J]. Aquaculture,1990,88(1):39-53.
[27]INGLIS G J,HAYDEN B J,ROSS A H. An overview of factors affecting the carrying capacity of coastal embayments for mussel culture[R]. Christchurch:National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research,2000.
[28]YOU J Y,YU L J. A set of web-based public decision support tools for integrated planning and management in aquaculture[J]. Methods,2022,9:101795.
[29]DUC N M. Contribution of fish production to farmers' subjective well-being in Vietnam:a Logistic model[J]. Journal of the world aquaculture society,2009,40(3):417-424.
[30]RAMON F,JON G. A box model for ecosystem-level management of mussel culture carrying capacity in a coastal bay[J]. Ecosystems,2009,12:1222-1233.
[31]CHRISTENSEN V,PAULY D. ECOPATH II:a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics[J]. Ecological modelling,1992,61(3/4):169-185.
[32]FAHMIDA W T,NASRIN A,ANINDYA N,et al. Integrating AIoT technologies in aquaculture:a systematic review[J]. Future internet,2025,17(5):199.
[33]MCKINDSEY C W,THETMEYER H,LANDRY T,et al. Review of recent carrying capacity models for bivalve culture and recommendations for research and management[J]. Aquaculture,2006,261(2):451-462.
[34]WEITZMAN J,FILGUEIRA R. The evolution and application of carrying capacity in aquaculture:towards a research agenda[J]. Reviews in aquaculture,2020,12(3):1297-1322.
[35]KAPETSKY J M,HILL J M,WORTHY L D. A geographical information system for catfish farming development[J]. Aquaculture,1988,68(4):311-320.
[36]FALCONER L,TELFER T C,ROSS L G. Investigation of a novel approach for aquaculture site selection[J]. Journal of environmental management,2016,181:791-804.
[37]CLAWSON G,KUEMPEL C D,FRAZIER M,et al. Mapping the spatial distribution of global mariculture production[J]. Aquaculture,2022,553:738066.
[38]BUITRAGO J,RADA M,HERNÁNDEZ H,et al. A single-use site selection technique,using GIS,for aquaculture planning:choosing locations for mangrove oyster raft culture in Margarita Island,Venezuela[J]. Environmental management,2005,35(5):544-556.
[39]RADIARTA I N,SAITOH S I,MIYAZONO A. GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation models for identifying suitable sites for Japanese scallop(Mizuhopecten yessoensis)aquaculture in Funka Bay,southwestern Hokkaido,Japan[J]. Aquaculture,2008,284(1/4):127-135.
[40]FRANCISCO V S,MARCELO E A,GERMAN P D. Opportunities for strengthening aquaculture industry through multicriteria decision-making[J]. Reviews in aquaculture,2019,11(1):105-118.
[41]COUTURE J L,DUMAS J,FEKETE B M,et al. Scenario analysis can guide aquaculture planning to meet sustainable future production goals[J]. ICES journal of marine science,2021,78(3):821-831.
[42]HE R J,GUO D,HUANG Z,et al. Systematic investigation of stereochemistry,stereoselective bioactivity,and antifungal mechanism of chiral triazole fungicide metconazole[J]. Science of the total environment,2021,784:147194.
[43]FERREIRA J G,HAWKINS A J S,BRICKER S B. Management of productivity,environmental effects and profitability of shellfish aquaculture:the farm aquaculture resource management(FARM)model[J]. Aquaculture,2007,264(4):160-174.
[44]NEWELL C R,HAWKINS A J S,MORRIS K,et al. ShellGIS:a dynamic tool for shellfish farm site selection[J]. World aquaculture,2013,44(3):50-53.
[45]GIMPEL A,STELZENMÜLLER V,TOPSCH S,et al. A GIS-based tool for an integrated assessment of spatial planning trade-offs with aquaculture[J]. Science of the total environment,2018,627:1644-1655.
[46]ERVIK A,AGNALT A L,ASPLIN L,et al. AkvaVis-dynamic GIS-tool for siting of fish farms for new aquaculture species:environmental quality requirements for new aquaculture species and Atlantic salmon [R]. Bergen:Institute of Marine Research,2008.
[47]PHILLIPS S J,ANDERSON R P,SCHAPIRE R E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions[J]. Ecological modelling,2006,190(3/4):231-259.
[48]BALL I R,POSSINGHAM H P,WATTS M. Marxan and relatives:software for spatial conservation prioritization[M]//MOILANEN A,WILSON K A,POSSINGHAM H P. Spatial conservation prioritization:quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2009.
[49]LACROIX D,PIOCH S. The multi-use in wind farm projects:more conflicts or a win-win opportunity?[J]. Aquatic living resources,2011,24(2):129-135.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-03-18.
基金项目:江苏省海洋科技创新项目(JSZRHYKJ202311)、江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX23_1725).
通讯作者:杜雯,硕士,初级,研究方向:海岸带资源保护与利用. E-mail:w76004@njnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-20