[1]管卫华,彭 鑫,张 惠,等.基于县域尺度的长三角城市综合竞争力格局研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2013,36(03):131-138.
 Guan Weihua,Peng Xin,Zhang Hui,et al.Study on the Pattern of Urban Comprehensive Competitiveness in Yangtze Delta Area Based on County Scale[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2013,36(03):131-138.
点击复制

基于县域尺度的长三角城市综合竞争力格局研究()
分享到:

《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
第36卷
期数:
2013年03期
页码:
131-138
栏目:
地理学
出版日期:
2013-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Pattern of Urban Comprehensive Competitiveness in Yangtze Delta Area Based on County Scale
作者:
管卫华1彭 鑫1张 惠1吴 巍2
(1.南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023) (2.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏 南京 210093)
Author(s):
Guan Weihua1Peng Xin1Zhang Hui1Wu Wei2
(1.School of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China) (2.School of Geographic and Ocean Science,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
关键词:
城市竞争力县域尺度长三角因子分析格局
Keywords:
urban competitivenesscounty scaleYangtze delta areafactor analysispattern
分类号:
F290
摘要:
本文采用因子分析和聚类分析从县域尺度对2010年长三角75个县市(市区)进行城市竞争力格局分析,研究表明:影响长三角城市竞争力主要有县域发展规模和发展水平因子,以及发展结构、农业和环境、土地规模、教育水平因子.长三角城市综合竞争力呈现为以沪宁杭市区为核心,苏锡常甬市区为次核心,江苏省总体高于浙江省的格局.从城市各因子竞争力来看,城市发展规模因子呈现江苏高于浙江,杭州湾沿岸高于浙江省其他地区; 城市发展水平竞争力格局呈现出沪宁、沪杭和杭甬沿线县市等级较高; 城市发展结构竞争力呈现通泰扬、杭嘉湖和台州地区较高; 城市农业与环境竞争力格局呈现西北高东南低的格局; 城市土地规模竞争力呈现为南高北低的格局; 城市教育水平竞争力呈现出北高南低的格局.
Abstract:
This paper sets up evaluation index system of the urban competitiveness and adopts the factor analysis and cluster analysis to study the pattern of urban comprehensive competitiveness of 75 counties in Yangtze River Delta at the county scale in 2010.The results show that the factors as the development scale,development level,development structure,agriculture and environment,land scale,education level have been the main factors which affect the urban comprehensive competitiveness in Yangtze Delta area.The urban comprehensive competitiveness in county scale in Yangtze Delta area presents the pattern of core-marginal,that the downtown in Shanghai,Nanjing and Hangzhou is the core city,the downtown in Suzhou,Wuxi,Changzhou and Ningbo is the sub-core city,and other counties are marginal zone.The rank of urban comprehensive competitiveness in Jiangsu is higher than that of in Zhejiang.From the partten of urban comprehensive competitiveness of every factor in Yangtze River Delta,the pattern of urban development scale competitiveness is similar to that of the urban comprehensive competitiveness.The urban development scale competitiveness of Hangzhou bay coastal counties is higher than other counties in Zhejiang of Yangtze River Delta.The higher ranking counties of urban development level competitiveness in Yangtze River Delta are mainly distributed along the Huning,Huhang and Hangyong lines.The high ranking counties of urban development structure competitiveness in Yangtze Delta area are mainly distrubuted in Nantong Taizhou Yangzhou,and Hangzhou Jiaxing Huzhou Taizhou.The ranking pattern of urban agriculture and evironment competitiveness in county scale in Yangtze River Delta are mainly presented lower in south-east area than in the north-west area.The urban land scale competitiveness in county scale in Yangtze River Delta shows that the south area is higer than the north area.The urban education level competitiveness in county scale in Yangtze River Delta assumed that the north area is higer than the south area.

参考文献/References:

[1] 倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力报告9(城市:让世界倾斜面平坦)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:82-83.
[2]于涛方.国外城市竞争力研究综述[J].国外城市规划,2004,19(1):28-34.
[3]江洪,刘志刚,叶茂,等.城市竞争力的理论基础及其特点初探[J].经济问题探索,2012(6):54-58.
[4]王发曾,吕金嵘.中原城市群城市竞争力的评价与时空演变[J].地理研究,2011,30(1):49-60.
[5][美]迈克尔·波特.国家竞争优势[M].北京:华厦出版社,2002:58-65.
[6]中国人民大学竞争力与评价研究中心研究组.中国国际竞争力发展报告(2003)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:132-268.
[7]Douglas Webster,Muller Larissa.Urban competitiveness assessment in developing country urban regions:The road forward[C]//Washington D C:Paper Prepared for Urban Group,INFUD,the World Bank,2000.
[8]Kresl P K,Singh B.Competitiveness and the urban economy:Twenty-four large US metropolitan areas[J].Urban Studies,1999,36(5/6):1 017-1 028.
[9]Sotarauta M,Linnamaa R.Urban Competitiveness and Management of Urban Policy Networks:Some Reflections From Tampere and Oulu[C]//Conference Cities at the Millenium:London,1998:132-152.
[10]Jiang Yihong,Shen Jianfa.Measuring the urban competitiveness of Chinese cities in 2000[J].Cities,2010,27(5):307-314.
[11]Jurgita Bruneckiene,Andrius Guzavicius,Renata Cincikaite.Measurement of urban competitiveness in lithuania[J].Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics,2010,21(5):493-508.
[12]Peter Kresl,Balwant Singh.Urban competitiveness and US metropolitan centres[J].Urban Studies,2012,49(2)239-254.
[13]赵义华,曹荣林.长江三角洲各城市竞争力时间演变及影响因素研究[J].山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2007,22(3):72-75.
[14]倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力理论研究与实证分析[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2001:23-40.
[15]连玉明.中国城市蓝皮书[M].北京:中国时代经济出版社,2003:120-136.
[16]李永强.城市竞争力评价的结构方程模型研究[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2001:68-179.
[17]郝寿义,倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力研究—以若干城市为例[J].经济科学,1998(3):50-54.
[18]宁越敏,唐礼智.城市竞争力的概念和指标体系[J].现代城市研究,2001(3):19-22.
[19]王桂新,沈建法.中国地级以上城市综合竞争力研究[J].复旦大学学报:社会科学版,2002(3):69-77.
[20]徐康宁.论城市竞争与城市竞争力[J].南京社会科学,2002(5):1-6.
[21]侯光雷,王志敏,张洪岩,等.基于探索性空间分析的东北经济区城市竞争力研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(4):67-72.
[22]沈璐璐,张争胜,罗丰,等.基于主成分分析的河南省城市竞争力评价研究[J].河南科学,2011,29(4):489-494.
[23]许学强,程玉鸿.珠江三角洲城市群的城市竞争力时空演变[J].地理科学,2006,26(3):257-265.
[24]郝方方,石培基,陈丽红.城市竞争力差异及其影响因素分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(7):82-86.
[25]王林伶.宁夏县域经济竞争力评价及实证研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2011(3):31-34.
[26]石忆邵,张洪武.长江三角洲城市综合竞争力与区域优势分析[J].城市规划汇刊,2002(1):17-21.
[27]于丽英,郭洪晶.长江三角洲地区城市综合竞争力的评价研究[J].上海大学学报:社会科学版,2011,18(1):79-90.
[28]王影,鄢涛.城市竞争力综合评价方法研究——以江西省为例[J].科技管理研究,2010(13):239-242.
[29]田瑾,项静恬,李宝慧.经济,环境等非线性系统的预测和调控[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001:169-181.
[30]苏金明,傅荣华.统计软件SPSS系列应用实战篇[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002:303-304.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-03-13.
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41271128)、江苏省高校自然科学基础研究项目(11KJB170003)、江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(地理学).
通讯联系人:管卫华,博士,副教授,研究方向:城市与区域经济地理.E-mail:guanweihua@njnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-09-30