[1]王 毅,靳 诚,朱英明,等.浙江省公共服务水平的空间不均衡及其影响因素研究[J].南京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,42(01):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2019.01.018]
 Wang Yi,Jin Cheng,Zhu Yingming,et al.Evaluation of the Spatial Inequity of Public Service Leveland its Influencing Factors in Zhejiang Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2019,42(01):113.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2019.01.018]
点击复制

浙江省公共服务水平的空间不均衡及其影响因素研究()
分享到:

《南京师范大学学报》(自然科学版)[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
113
栏目:
·地理学·
出版日期:
2019-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of the Spatial Inequity of Public Service Leveland its Influencing Factors in Zhejiang Province
文章编号:
1001-4616(2019)01-0113-11
作者:
王 毅1靳 诚2朱英明1陆玉麒2马颖忆3丁正山2
(1.南京理工大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210094)(2.南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)(3.金陵科技学院建筑工程学院,江苏 南京 211169)
Author(s):
Wang Yi1Jin Cheng2Zhu Yingming1Lu Yuqi2Ma Yingyi3Ding Zhengshan2
(1.School of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China)(2.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(3.School of Architectural Engineering,Jinling Institute of Technology,Nanjing
关键词:
公共服务综合水平空间不均衡可达性影响因素浙江省
Keywords:
public servicecomprehensive levelspatial inequityaccessibilityinfluencing factorZhejiang Province
分类号:
F590
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2019.01.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以浙江省为研究区域,基于第一次地理国情普查数据,将可达性分析与地统计分析相结合,研究浙江省2014年公共服务设施综合水平的空间分异特征及影响机制. 结果显示:浙江省公共服务设施综合水平总体较高,但空间不均衡特征显著,大体上由东向西、由北向南逐渐降低; 公共服务设施综合水平集聚分布特征明显,东北部平原地区高水平集聚,西南部边缘山区低水平集聚; 公共服务设施综合水平与人口分布空间相关性较强,大部分人口分布于等级较高的地区. 地形地貌区域分异对浙江省公共服务综合水平的地域差异起基础性作用,以人口规模和收入水平为主导的需求因素驱动公共服务综合水平空间分异,公共服务设施的投入水平和供给能力共同影响公共服务发展水平,以区域投资和公共服务支出为代表的政策制度因素也会诱导公共服务水平空间不均衡. 本文从可达性视角综合测度了区域公共服务的不均衡特征及其与人口分布的空间关系,可为促进区域之间的社会公平提供决策依据.
Abstract:
In this paper,the spatial accessibility to six types of public service facilities in Zhejiang Province were measured,and the driving factors of their spatial inequity were analyzed by combining least cost path analysis,geostatistical analysis and multiple linear regression model based on the first geographical conditions survey data. The results showed that the comprehensive accessibility to the public service facilities in Zhejiang Province was relative high on the whole,while the spatial inequity in access to facilities was quite obvious. In general,the comprehensive accessibility of public service facilities gradually decreased from east to west and from north to south. Besides,there was significant characteristics of spatial concentration in the distribution of the comprehensive accessibility. The areas with the highest and higher accessibility were mainly distributed in the northeast regions. The areas with the lowest and lower accessibility tend to be agglomerated in mountainous areas and provincial border-regions in the central and western regions in Zhejiang Province. Moreover,there was a strong correlation between the comprehensive accessibility of public service facilities and the spatial distribution of population,and most of population was distributed in areas with a high public service comprehensive accessibility. The regional terrain difference played a primary role in the spatial pattern of the comprehensive accessibility of public service facilities in Zhejiang Province. The demand for services based on population size and the income level had a driving effect on the spatial variation of the comprehensive accessibility. In addition,the input level and supply capacity of the public service also affected the development of the public service facilities. At last,policy and institutional factors,represented by the ability of regional investment and public service spending,also induce spatial imbalances in public service levels. From the perspective of spatial accessibility,this study explored the spatial inequity characteristics of the regional public service and its relationship with the population distribution. It can provide a reference for improving the regional social equity in different areas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈昌盛,蔡跃洲. 中国政府公共服务:体制变迁与地区综合评估[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007:32-33.
[2]高军波,周春山,王义民,等. 转型时期广州城市公共服务设施空间分析[J]. 地理研究,2011,30(3):424-435.
[3]BROADBENT J. Reclaiming the ideal of public service[J]. Public money and management,2013,33(6):391-394.
[4]RAPP L. Public service or universal service[J]. Telecommunications policy,1996,20(6):391-397.
[5]曾红颖. 我国基本公共服务均等化标准体系及转移支付效果评价[J]. 经济研究,2012(6):20-32.
[6]SMITH A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations[M]. Edwin Cannan’s annotated ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1777:87-88.
[7]SAMUELSON P A. The pure theory of public expenditures[J]. Review of economics and statistics,1954,36(4):387-389.
[8]BOYNE G,POWELL M,ASHWORTH R. Spatial equity and public services:an empirical analysis of local government finance in England[J]. Public management review,2001,3(1):19-34.
[9]BERMAN E M,BOWMAN J S,WEST J P,et al. Human resource management in public service:paradoxes,processes,and problems[M]. California:Sage Publications,2012:101-102.
[10]LI H P,WANG Q F,SHI W,et al. Residential clustering and spatial access to public services in Shanghai[J]. Habitat international,2015,46:119-129.
[11]骆永民,樊丽明. 中国农村基础设施增收效应的空间特征:基于空间相关性和空间异质性的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2012(5):71-87.
[12]迟瑶,王艳慧. 武陵山片区扶贫重点县农村基本公共服务均衡化差异分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2016,18(3):298-306.
[13]马慧强,韩增林,江海旭. 我国基本公共服务空间差异格局与质量特征分析[J]. 经济地理,2011,31(2):212-217.
[14]韩增林,李彬,张坤领. 中国城乡基本公共服务均等化及其空间格局分析[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(11):2035-2048.
[15]GOMAA M D,MERAJ N M,RAMZE A E,et al. GIS-based public services analysis based on municipal election areas:a methodological approach for the city of Makkah,Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of geographic information system,2013,5:378-395.
[16]熊娟,罗静,彭菁,等. 基于可达性的县域医疗服务均等化分析:以湖北省松滋市为例[J]. 人文地理,2012,27(5):25-29.
[17]关松林. 区域内义务教育师资均衡配置:问题与破解[J]. 教育研究,2013,34(12):46-51.
[18]陶卓霖,程杨,戴特奇. 北京市养老设施空间可达性评价[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(5):616-624.
[19]钟少颖,杨鑫,陈锐. 层级性公共服务设施空间可达性研究:以北京市综合性医疗设施为例[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(4):731-744.
[20]樊立惠,蔺雪芹,王岱. 北京市公共服务设施供需协调发展的时空演化特征:以教育医疗设施为例[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(1):90-97.
[21]黄晓燕,张爽,曹小曙. 广州市地铁可达性时空演化及其对公交可达性的影响[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(8):1078-1089.
[22]王宇渠,陈忠暖,覃水娇. 地铁站点可达性、客流与站点商圈零售商业结构关系研究:以广州市为例[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(4):66-71.
[23]封志明,刘晓娜. 中国人口分布与经济发展空间一致性研究[J]. 人口与经济,2013(2):3-11.
[24]蔡秀云,李雪,汤寅昊. 公共服务与人口城市化发展关系研究[J]. 中国人口科学,2012(6):58-65,112.
[25]ZHAO Y,CUI S,YANG J,et al. Basic public health services delivered in an urban community:a qualitative study[J]. Public health,2011,125(1):37-45.
[26]DOMENICO M D,TRACE P,HUAUGH H. Social economy involvement in public service delivery:community engagement and accountability[J]. Regional studies,2009,43(7):981-992.
[27]CHEN F N. Commuting distances in a household location choice model with amenities[J]. Journal of urban economics,2008,63(1):116-129.
[28]马晓冬,沈正平,宋潇君. 江苏省城乡公共服务发展差距及其障碍因素分析[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(1):89-93.
[29]尹境悦,马晓冬. 江苏省城乡公共服务区域差异的调查分析[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(6):97-105.
[30]战金艳,鲁奇. 中国基础设施与城乡一体化的关联发展[J]. 地理学报,2003,58(4):611-619.
[31]靳诚,黄震方. 基于可达性技术的长江三角洲旅游区划[J]. 地理研究,2012,31(4):745-757.
[32]王毅,丁正山,余茂军,等. 基于耦合模型的现代服务业与城市化协调关系量化分析:以江苏省常熟市为例[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(1):97-108.
[33]柯文前,陆玉麒,俞肇元,等. 多变量驱动的江苏县域经济空间格局演化[J]. 地理学报,2013,68(6):802-812.
[34]王毅,陆玉麒,车冰清,等. 浙江省生态环境宜居性测评[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(3):380-387.
[35]郑文升,蒋华雄,艾红如,等. 中国基础医疗卫生资源供给水平的区域差异[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(11):2049-2060.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-09-24.
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDA053)、国家自然科学基金重点项目(41430635)、国家自然科学基金项目(41701127、41871137).
通讯联系人:靳诚,博士,副教授,研究方向:区域发展与旅游地理. E-mail:jincheng@njnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-30