|Table of Contents|

Spatial Pattern and Driving Mechanism on Coordinative and HarmoniousDevelopment Between Tourism Economic and Urbanization——A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta(PDF)

《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2016年01期
Page:
101-
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Spatial Pattern and Driving Mechanism on Coordinative and HarmoniousDevelopment Between Tourism Economic and Urbanization——A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta
Author(s):
Wang Kun12Huang Zhenfang1
(1.School of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.School of History Culture and Tourism,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116,China)
Keywords:
tourism economyurbanizationcoupling and coordination developmentYangtze River Delta
PACS:
F590
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Based on the evaluation index system of tourism economy and urbanization and the model of coordinative and harmonious degree,the paper discusses the evolution of spatial pattern and its driving mechanism of regional urban tourism economy and urbanization in Yangtze River Delta. Results show that the coupling and coordination development in Yangtze River Delta as a whole has been in the moderate coupling stage. Shanghai,Hangzhou,Nanjing and the surrounding cities of coupling and coordination degree is relatively high,and the cites in the northern and middle of Jiangsu province of coupling and coordination degree is relatively low. Combined with the coupling and coordination degree,the region could be divided into four types include harmony area,running-in area,antagonism area and low coupling area of tourism economy and urbanization. The paper thinks that breeding the Multiple driving mechanism,including policy guarantee and policy regulation mechanism,the structure transformation and the tourism industry running mechanism,tourism service promotion and marketing mechanism,social security and social justice mechanism,can improve the level of coupling and coordination development between tourism economic and urbanization in Yangtze River Delta.

References:

[1] 陆林,葛敬炳. 旅游城市化研究进展及启示[J]. 地理研究,2006,25(4):741-750.
[2] MULLINS P. Tourism urbanization[J]. International journal of urban and regional research,1991,15(3):326-342.
[3] GLADSTONE D L. Tourism urbanization in the United States[J]. Urban affairs review,1998,33(1):3-27.
[4] 黄震方,吴江,侯国林. 关于旅游城市化问题的初步探讨:以长江三角洲都市连绵区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2000,9(2):160-165.
[5] 葛敬炳,陆林,凌善金. 丽江市旅游城市化特征及机理分析[J]. 地理科学,2009,29(1):134-140.
[6] 麻学锋,孙根年. 张家界旅游城市化响应强度与机制分析[J]. 旅游学刊,2012,27(3):36-42.
[7] 余凤龙,黄震方. 中国城镇化进程对农村居民旅游消费的影响[J]. 经济管理,2013,511(7):125-134.
[8] 杨亚丽,孙根年. 城市化推动我国国内旅游发展的时空动态分析[J]. 经济地理,2013,33(7):169-175.
[9] 王兆峰,余含. 基于交通改善的湘西旅游城镇化响应时空分异与机制研究[J]. 经济地理,2013,33(1):187-192.
[10] 周少雄. 试论旅游发展与城市化进程的互动关系[J]. 商业经济与管理,2002,124(2):55-58.
[11] 吴国清. 区域旅游城市化与城市旅游区域化研究:兼论长三角区域一体化的旅游互动[J]. 地域研究与开发,2008,27(1):51-55.
[12] 赵磊. 城市化对典型省际区域旅游业产业效应的实证研究:1996-2008:以江苏、河南和陕西为例[J]. 人文地理,2011,121(5):99-104.
[13] 钟家雨,柳思维,熊曦. 旅游业与城镇化协同发展的区域差异分析[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(2):187-192.
[14] 徐洁,华钢,胡平. 城市化水平与旅游发展之关系初探:基于我国改革开放三十年的时间序列动态计量分析[J]. 人文地理,2010,120(2):85-90.
[15] 高楠,马耀峰,李天顺,等. 基于耦合模型的旅游产业与城市化协调发展研究:以西安市为例[J]. 旅游学刊,2013,28(1):62-68.
[16] 马丽,金凤君,刘毅. 中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(10):1 299-1 307.
[17] 曹芳东,黄震方,吴江,等. 转型期城市旅游业绩效系统耦合关联性测度及其前景预测:以泛长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 经济地理,2012,32(4):160-166.
[18] 方叶林,黄震方,段忠贤,等. 中国旅游业发展与生态环境耦合协调研究[J]. 经济地理,2013,33(12):159-201.
[19] 乔家君. 改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J]. 资源科学,2004,26(1):113-119.
[20] 廖重斌. 环境与经济协调发展的定量评价及其分类体系:以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 热带地理,1999,19(2):171-177.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-03-30