|Table of Contents|

Construction of Urban Ecological Security Pattern Based onMCR Model:a Case Study of Pingliang City,Gansu Province(PDF)

《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2021年03期
Page:
54-62
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Construction of Urban Ecological Security Pattern Based onMCR Model:a Case Study of Pingliang City,Gansu Province
Author(s):
Zhang Yixuan1234Wei Hong1234Na Jiaming1234Ou Weixin56Lan Jing56Lu Xiu1234
(1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment of Ministry of Education,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(3.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing 210023,China)(4.State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution(Jiangsu Province),Nanjing 210023,China)(5.College of Land Management,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China)(6.State and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Rural Land Resources Utilization and Consolidation,Nanjing 210095,China)
Keywords:
ecological security patternminimum cumulative resistance(MCR)modelecological sourceecological resistance surfacePingliang City
PACS:
X826,X321,P901
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2021.03.009
Abstract:
The establishment of urban ecological security pattern is of great significance for urban planning of spatial expansion and the health and stability maintaining of regional ecological processes. The ecological security pattern of Pingliang City in Western China is studied based on the minimum cumulative resistance(MCR)model and geographic information spatial analysis. Combined with land use data,this paper divides the ecological source areas by four comprehensive indicators:soil erosion sensitivity,biodiversity maintenance function,water conservation function and soil conservation function. From three aspects of natural factors,economic factors,and social factors,eight resistance factors such as altitude,slope and land use were selected as constraints to establish resistance surface. The MCR model is used to extract the ecological corridor and ecological nodes,generate the ecological security pattern,and conduct optimal protection suggestions. The results show that:firstly,the ecological source of Pingliang City covers 1 049.38 km2,which is 9.44% of the total area,and has a clear spatial agglomeration in distribution. Secondly,the basic framework of ecological security pattern of Pingliang City,including 16 main ecological corridors,25 secondary ecological corridors and 34 ecological nodes,were generated by MCR model. Thirdly,the ecological security pattern of “two ecological barriers,five ecological corridors,three soil and water conservation functional areas and multiple ecological nodes”in the study area was conducted. This study is expected to provide a reference case for the land use improvement and ecological security optimization in the western region of China.

References:

[1] 邱硕,王宇欣,王平智,等. 基于MCR模型的城镇生态安全格局构建和建设用地开发模式[J]. 农业工程学报,2018,34(17):257-265,302.
[2]傅伯杰. 我国生态系统研究的发展趋势与优先领域[J]. 地理研究,2010,29(3):383-396.
[3]王根绪,程国栋,钱鞠. 生态安全评价研究中的若干问题[J]. 应用生态学报,2003,14(9):1551-1556.
[4]叶鑫,邹长新,刘国华,等. 生态安全格局研究的主要内容与进展[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(10):3382-3392.
[5]王耕,周腾禹. 基于文献计量分析的区域生态安全研究热点与趋势[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(18):6950-6957.
[6]彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序,等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(3):407-419.
[7]马克明,傅伯杰,黎晓亚,等. 区域生态安全格局:概念与理论基础[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(4):761-768.
[8]李政,丁忆,王亚林,等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的山地石漠化地区生态安全格局构建——以重庆市南川区为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(8):1046-1054.
[9]樊杰. 我国国土空间开发保护格局优化配置理论创新与“十三五”规划的应对策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2016,31(1):1-12.
[10]彭建,汪安,刘焱序,等. 城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(2):333-346.
[11]侯大伟,刘艳,孙华. 退耕还林背景下寒地山区土地生态安全格局动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(18):267-276.
[12]王石英,蔡强国,吴淑安. 中国北方农牧交错区研究展望[J]. 水土保持研究,2004,11(4):138-142.
[13]喻锋,李晓兵,王宏,等. 皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价[J]. 地理学报,2006,61(6):645-653.
[14]谭华清,张金亭,周希胜. 基于最小累计阻力模型的南京市生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持通报,2020,40(3):282-288,296,325.
[15]叶玉瑶,苏泳娴,张虹鸥,等. 生态阻力面模型构建及其在城市扩展模拟中的应用[J]. 地理学报,2014,69(4):485-496.
[16]李谦,戴靓,朱青,等. 基于最小阻力模型的土地整治中生态连通性变化及其优化研究[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(6):733-739.
[17]俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报,1999,19(1):8-15.
[18]魏伟,颉耀文,魏晓旭,等. 基于CLUE-S模型和生态安全格局的石羊河流域土地利用优化配置[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2017,42(9):1306-1315.
[19]黄成,吴传清. 主体功能区制度与西部地区生态文明建设研究[J]. 中国软科学,2019(11):166-175.
[20]冯斐,唐睿,冯学钢. 西部地区旅游扶贫效率及其影响因素研究——以甘肃省平凉市为例[J]. 地域研究与开发,2020,39(2):105-110.
[21]吴艳霞,罗恒,王彦龙. 基于Lotka-Volterra共生模型的关中平原城市群生态安全测度研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2019,39(6):230-239,245,322.
[22]邓红兵,陈春娣,刘昕,等. 区域生态用地的概念及分类[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(3):1519-1524.
[23]迟妍妍,许开鹏,王晶晶,等. 京津冀地区生态空间识别研究[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(23):8555-8563.
[24]李赛赛,朱正如,吕乐婷,等. 基于RUSLE模型的太子河流域土壤侵蚀特征研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2020,38(3):141-144,82.
[25]张科利,彭文英,杨红丽. 中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J]. 土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.
[26]宋明华,刘丽萍,陈锦,等. 草地生态系统生物和功能多样性及其优化管理[J]. 生态环境学报,2018,27(6):1179-1188.
[27]熊善高,秦昌波,于雷,等. 基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的生态空间划定研究——以南宁市为例[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(22):7899-7911.
[28]荣月静,杜世勋,郭新亚,等. 太岳山地生态系统服务功能权衡协同关系研究[J]. 环境科学与技术,2018,41(11):181-190.
[29]邓伟,齐静,孙荣,等. 生态功能保护条件下的重庆市生态保护红线划分[J]. 水土保持通报,2018,38(5):154-160,353.
[30]潘梅,陈天伟,黄麟,等. 京津冀地区生态系统服务时空变化及驱动因素[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(15):5151-5167.
[31]谢花林,姚干,何亚芬,等. 基于GIS的关键性生态空间辨识——以鄱阳湖生态经济区为例[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(16):5926-5937.
[32]程迎轩,王红梅,刘光盛,等. 基于最小累计阻力模型的生态用地空间布局优化[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(16):248-257,315.
[33]KNAAPEN J P,SCHEFFER M,HARMS B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning[J]. Landscape and urban planning,1992,23(1):1-16.
[34]陈昕,彭建,刘焱序,等. 基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(3):471-484.
[35]李航鹤,马腾辉,王坤,等. 基于最小累积阻力模型(MCR)和空间主成分分析法(SPCA)的沛县北部生态安全格局构建研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(8):1036-1045.
[36]王原,何成,刘荣国,等. 宁夏沙坡头国家自然保护区鸟类景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(16):5531-5541.
[37]蔡天雨,徐磊,陈亚恒,等. 基于生态安全的青龙满族自治县土地利用冲突识别[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(5):273-280,2.
[38]杨天荣,匡文慧,刘卫东,等. 基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(3):441-452.
[39]杨姗姗,邹长新,沈渭寿,等. 基于生态红线划分的生态安全格局构建——以江西省为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(1):250-258.
[40]王洁,李锋,钱谊,等. 基于生态服务的城乡景观生态安全格局的构建[J]. 环境科学与技术,2012,35(11):199-205.
[41]朱军,李益敏,余艳红. 基于GIS的高原湖泊流域生态安全格局构建及优化研究——以星云湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(8):1237-1250.
[42]于成龙,刘丹,冯锐,等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的东北地区生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(1):290-301.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-09-15