|Table of Contents|

The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Multi-Scale City Health Examination Index and Its Driving Factors:a Case Stady of Liandu District, Lishui City(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2023年02期
Page:
54-60
Research Field:
地理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Multi-Scale City Health Examination Index and Its Driving Factors:a Case Stady of Liandu District, Lishui City
Author(s):
Yu Guoqiang1; Ding Yan2; Tian Ran1; 2; Zhang Lun2; Sun Yizhong2
(1.Ningbo Yinzhou Planning & Design Institute,Ningbo 315192,China)
(2.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
city health examination;  health index;  entropy weight method;  driving factor
PACS:
TU984
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2023.02.007
Abstract:
Taking Liandu District of Lishui City as an example, a city health examination index system from street and community scales is constructed, and then the city health examination index is calculated based on the entropy weight method. The spatial distribution characteristics of city health examination index and its driving factors at different scales are analyzed, the results show that:(1)Communities are mostly distributed in streets which have higher index values, and the magnitude of the index values of community and street is in a certain consistency.(2)The factors of ecological livability and health and comfort have the strongest influence at the street scale, while the aspects of safety and resilience and convenient transportation are at the community scale. Moreover, at both scales, there is a two-factor enhanced interaction between the dominant factors.(3)The region where the dominant factor has the greatest effect is also the region with high values of the city health examination index.

References:

[1]李栋. 政策评估视角下城市体检概念辨析与再认识[J]. 上海城市规划,2022,162(1):8-15.
[2]张乐敏,张若曦,黄宇轩,等. 面向完整社区的城市体检评估指标体系构建与实践[J]. 规划师,2022,38(3):45-52.
[3]马文军,李亮,王奕曾,等. 面向健康安全高密度城市治理的社区生活圈体检评估[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(11):1628-1636.
[4]庞国彧,蒋海勇,黄瓒,等. 次优理论下的市县级城市体检策略与诊断实践——以梧州市为例[J]. 规划师,2022,38(9):117-122.
[5]何炬,张文忠,曹靖,等. 多源数据在城市体检中的有机融合与应用——以北京市为例[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(2):185-197.
[6]杨艺,李国平,孙瑀,等. 国内外大城市体检与规划实施评估的比较研究[J]. 地理科学,2022,42(2):198-207.
[7]王学栋,朱佩娟,王楠,等. 人居环境视角下多级协同的城市体检模式研究[J]. 规划师,2022,38(3):12-19.
[8]杨婕,柴彦威. 城市体检的理论思考与实践探索[J]. 上海城市规划,2022,162(1):1-7.
[9]伍江,王信,陈烨,等. 超大城市城市体检的挑战与上海实践[J]. 城市规划学刊,2022,270(4):28-34.
[10]单卓然,安月辉,袁满,等. 中国与英国城市体检评估工作的对比解析及政策建议[J]. 规划师,2022,38(3):53-60.
[11]林润泽,邹诚,王梓凌,等. 基于多源数据的城市中心区域街道活力与美景度研究——以福州市鼓楼区为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2021,44(3):63-69.
[12]詹美旭,魏宗财,王建军,等. 面向国土空间安全的城市体检评估方法及治理策略——以广州为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2021,36(9):2382-2393.
[13]肖扬谋,谢波,陈宇杰.“以人为本”视角下的城市体检逻辑与优化策略[J]. 规划师,2022,38(3):28-34.
[14]孔令彦,关丽,丁燕杰,等. 空间大数据支持下的城市区域评估及其关键技术[J]. 测绘通报,2017(8):100-105.
[15]徐勤政,何永,甘霖,等. 从城市体检到街区诊断——大栅栏城市更新调研[J]. 北京规划建设,2018(2):142-148.
[16]杨静,吕飞,史艳杰,等. 社区体检评估指标体系的构建与实践[J]. 规划师,2022,38(3):35-44.
[17]韩艳. 村镇宜居社区评价及应用研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2015.
[18]王腾,宋知达,姜冬睿,等. 知识图谱驱动的多类型城市体检协同方法研究[J]. 上海城市规划,2022,162(1):25-31.
[19]杨大伟,康琦,何雅兰,等. 碳中和目标下的城市土地集约利用评价——基于DPSIR模型的西安市探索[J]. 国土资源科技管理,2022,39(1):69-80.
[20]宫攀,张槊. 标度律视角下城市体检评估与地区差异研究[J]. 城市问题,2022,325(8):24-35.
[21]周立斌,李刚,迟国泰. 基于R聚类-变异系数分析的人的全面发展评价指标体系构建[J]. 系统工程,2010,28(12):56-63.
[22]李秀霞,张希. 基于熵权法的城市化进程中土地生态安全研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(9):13-17.
[23]王劲峰,徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[24]卢海滨,孙毅中,李昳,等. 基于空间层次单元协同模式的“两规”用地差异性研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2018,41(3):138-144.
[25]SONG Y,WANG J,GE Y,et al. An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis:cases with different types of spatial data[J]. GIScience & remote sensing,2020,57(5):593-610.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-06-15