|Table of Contents|

Construction and Empirical Analysis of Functional ClassificationSystem of “Production-Living-Ecological”Land:a CaseStudy of Yangzhong City,Jiangsu Province(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2021年02期
Page:
55-61
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Construction and Empirical Analysis of Functional ClassificationSystem of “Production-Living-Ecological”Land:a CaseStudy of Yangzhong City,Jiangsu Province
Author(s):
Li Xin1; 2; Yin Rumeng1; Wang Dan3; Chen Tianyue1; Fang Bin1
(1.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.College of Agriculture,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,China)(3.Department of Resource & Environment Engineering,Yangzhou Polytechnic College,Yangzhou 225009,China)
Keywords:
land use; “production-living-ecological”land; multifunctional classification of land use; Yangzhong City
PACS:
K902,F301.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2021.02.009
Abstract:
Through the definition of land ecology and the value orientation of “production-living-ecological”land,this paper connected the global land ecosystem of “humanity”needs with the current land use classification system to construct a functional classification system of“production-living-ecological”land with positive and negative characteristics. Taking Yangzhong City in Jiangsu Province as an example,an empirical analysis was carried out to divide the production,living and ecological land in the study area,the entropy index was 0.987 0,and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index was 0.343 2. The production land in the study area was in a regular block mode,the living land was multi-centered in a chessboard pattern,and the ecological land was distributed along the river. The coupling relationship was tight among them. The“production-living-ecological”function in Yangzhong City was generally good. Production function was closely related to living function,ecological function effectively supported production function. The spatial compatibility between living function and“production-living-ecological”function was low. It was necessary to improve the efficiency of the internal construction land,for promoting the coordinated development of“production-living-ecological”function. The positive and negative function classification system of “production-living-ecological”land has strong practicality and reality,which can provide reference for optimizing the land space.

References:

[1] 龙花楼,屠爽爽. 论乡村重构[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(4):563-576.
[2]龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与土地资源管理[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618.
[3]秦明周. 土地利用分类及其影响因素研究[J]. 地域研究与开发,1997,16(1):14-17.
[4]LOVELAND T R,REED B C,BROWN J F,et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP discover from 1 km AVHRR data[J]. International journal of remote sensing,2000,21(6/7):1303-1330.
[5]HANSEN M C,REED B. A comparison of the IGBP discover and University of Maryland 1 km global land cover products[J]. International journal of remote sensing,2000,21(6/7):1365-1373.
[6]BARTHOLOME E,BELWARD A S. GLC2000:a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data[J]. International journal of remote sensing,2005,26(9):1959-1977.
[7]NEUMANN K,HEROLD M,HARTLEY A,et al. Comparative assessment of CORINE2000 and GLC2000:spatial analysis of land cover data for Europe[J]. International journal of applied earth observation & geoinformation,2007,9(4):425-437.
[8]陈婧,史培军. 土地利用功能分类探讨[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(5):536-540.
[9]邹利林,王建英,胡学东. 中国县级“三生用地”分类体系的理论构建与实证分析[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(4):59-66.
[10]刘平辉,郝晋珉. 土地利用分类系统的新模式:依据土地利用的产业结构而进行划分的探讨[J]. 中国土地科学,2003,17(1):16-26.
[11]肖宝英,陈高,代力民,等. 生态土地分类研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2002,13(11):1499-1502.
[12]梁留科,曹新向,孙淑英. 土地生态分类系统研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2003,17(5):142-146.
[13]岳健,张雪梅. 关于我国土地利用分类问题的讨论[J]. 干旱区地理,2003,26(1):78-88.
[14]龙花楼,刘永强,李婷婷,等. 生态用地分类初步研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(1):1-7.
[15]周宝同. 土地资源可持续利用基本理论探讨[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,29(2):310-314.
[16]李广东,方创琳. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报,2016,71(1):49-65.
[17]刘继来,刘彦随,李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(7):1290-1304.
[18]陈会,李阳兵,盛佳利. 基于土地利用变化的贵州坝子土地利用功能演变研究[J]. 生态学报,2019,34(24):1-14.
[19]MATHER A S.The forest transition[J]. Area,1992,24(4):367-379.
[20]GRAINGER A. National land use morphology:patterns and possibilities[J]. Geography,1995,80(3):235-245.
[21]龙花楼,屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(7):1-6.
[22]PEREZ-SOBA M,PETIT S,JONES L,et al. Land use functions-a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[C]//Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,2008:375-404.
[23]李欣,方斌,殷如梦,等. 村域尺度“三生”功能与生活质量感知空间格局及其关联:以江苏省扬中市为例[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(4):599-607.
[24]周应堂,王思明. 中国土地零碎化问题研究[J]. 中国土地科学,2008,22(11):50-54.
[25]SONG Y,MERLIN L,RODRIGUEZ D. Comparing measures of urban land use mix[J]. Computers,environment and urban systems,2013,42(7):1-13.
[26]徐柏翠,潘竟虎. 中国国家级非物质文化遗产的空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(5):188-196.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-06-30