|Table of Contents|

Research on Landscape Pattern Change and Driving Mechanism in Tiaozi Mud Reclamation Area in Jiangsu(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2022年01期
Page:
55-63
Research Field:
·海洋科学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on Landscape Pattern Change and Driving Mechanism in Tiaozi Mud Reclamation Area in Jiangsu
Author(s):
Yu Xuezhi1; Ji Yaobo2; Wang Lian1; Xu Min1
(1.School of Marine Science and Engineering,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(2.PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited,Hangzhou 311122,China)
Keywords:
landscape pattern; driving force; Tiaozi mud
PACS:
P901
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2022.01.009
Abstract:
Land reclamation is an important way to resolve land conflicts. Large-scale reclamation projects not only have a profound impact on the marine habitat,but also the changes in the landscape ecological pattern in the reclamation area directly affect the regional ecological changes. This paper selects Tiaozi mud reclamation area in Jiangsu as the research object,and uses data such as remote sensing images and environmental and ecological surveys in 2010,2015,2018 and 2020 to study the evolution of landscape pattern in the reclamation area,combined with landscape index changes,using the area transfer matrix model to analyze the driving factors,and then put forward ecological protection measures. The research results show that in the early stage of construction,the area of various landscapes has changed rapidly,fragmentation has increased,and the trend of landscape fragmentation has decreased during the restoration period. Development and ecological protection are the leading driving forces for the evolution of the landscape pattern in the reclamation area. Coordinating the development and ecological protection of the reclamation area can optimize and improve the landscape pattern and greatly enhance the ecological function of the reclamation area.

References:

[1] 李加林,杨晓平,童亿勤. 潮滩围垦对海岸环境的影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2007,26(2):43-51.
[2]PETHICK J. Estuarine and tidal wetland restoration in the United Kingdom:policy versus practice[J]. Restoration ecology,2002,10(3):431-437.
[3]CHEN X D,YU S B,CHEN J,et al. Environmental impact of large-scale tidal flats reclamation in Jiangsu,China[J]. Journal of coastal research,2020,95:315-319.
[4]SONG D H,WANG X H,ZHU X M,et al. Modeling studies of the far-field effects of tidal flat reclamation on tidal dynamics in the East China Seas[J]. Estuarine,coastal and shelf science,2013,133:147-160.
[5]孙连成. 淤泥质海岸人工港岛水沙环境与海洋生态研究[D]. 天津:交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究院,2016.
[6]龚文平,王道儒.海南省临高县调楼乡黄龙港北侧围海工程的自然条件可行性分析[J]. 海岸工程,1995(3):36-41.
[7]沈永明,冯年华,周勤,等. 江苏沿海滩涂围垦现状及其对环境的影响[J]. 海洋科学,2006(10):39-43.
[8]徐敏,李培英,陆培东. 淤长型潮滩适宜围填规模研究:以江苏省为例[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012.
[9]周昊昊,杜嘉,南颖,等. 1980年以来5个时期珠江三角洲滨海湿地景观格局及其变化特征[J]. 湿地科学,2019,17(5):559-566.
[10]贾艳艳,唐晓岚,刘振威,等. 1995—2016年长江沿岸芜湖区段景观格局梯度分析[J]. 地域研究与开发,2020,39(4):115-121.
[11]涂琦乐,刘晓东,华祖林,等. 条子泥围垦工程对近海生态环境的影响[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(6):542-547.
[12]陈才俊,徐向红. 条子泥一期工程对条子泥发育影响及工程防护措施[J]. 海洋工程,2015,33(5):105-112.
[13]周聪. 江苏条子泥垦区(一期)围垦工程后评价研究[D]. 南京:南京师范大学,2018.
[14]方仁建,沈永明,时海东. 基于围垦特征的海滨地区景观格局变化研究——以盐城海岸为例[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(3):641-651.
[15]杨钦,胡鹏,王建华,等. 1980—2018年扎龙湿地及乌裕尔河流域景观格局演变及其响应[J]. 水生态学杂志,2020,41(5):77-88.
[16]范晨璟,田莉,申世广,等. 1990—2015年间苏锡常都市圈城镇与绿色生态空间景观格局演变分析[J]. 现代城市研究,2018(11):13-19.
[17]色拥军,裴雯,马志兵,等. 盐池湾国家级自然保护区景观格局演变分析[J]. 环境科学与技术,2020,43(8):185-191.
[18]黄晓园,区智,彭建松,等. 普者黑省级自然保护区土地利用及景观格局变化研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2019,48(4):27-32,38.
[19]山中雪,赵霞,曹广超. 湟水流域近10年土地利用与景观格局演变分析[J]. 中国水土保持,2015(6):49-53.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01