|Table of Contents|

Study on the Process of Urbanization Development and ItsDriving Mechanism in Suzhou Since 1990(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2020年03期
Page:
99-105
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Process of Urbanization Development and ItsDriving Mechanism in Suzhou Since 1990
Author(s):
Wu Ju1; Qiao Weifeng2; 3; Wang Yahua2; 3
(1.Jiangsu Institute of Urban Planning and Design,Nanjing 210024,China)(2.School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)(3.Rural Revitalization Research Institute,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
Keywords:
urbanization; process; mechanism; principal component analysis; Suzhou
PACS:
K901.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2020.03.016
Abstract:
Urbanization development level is an important indicator to measure the degree of economic and social development in a region. It is of great significance to study the process of urbanization and its internal mechanism to construct new urbanization. Taking the developed city of Suzhou as an example,this paper constructs the comprehensive first-level indicators from the four aspects of population urbanization,land urbanization,economic urbanization and social urbanization to divide urbanization development process using entropy method of Suzhou,and adopts principal component analysis method to explore dynamic mechanism. The results show that:firstly,the whole process could be divided into three sections since 1990 in Suzhou:StageⅠis from 1990 to 1999 and belongs to the initial development. During this period,the driving force was mainly endogenous power. Stage Ⅱ is from 2000 to 2007 and belongs to the rapid development,which is mainly driven by foreign capital. Stage Ⅲ is from 2008 to 2015,the urbanization development shows a steady growth trend,characterized by industrial upgrading. Secondly,the driving factors affecting the development of urbanization in Suzhou are diversified,mainly due to economic development,foreign investment and industrial upgrading. This impact is consistent with the economic and social development of different development stages in Suzhou.

References:

[1] 李久枫,余华飞,付迎春,等. 广东省“人口—经济—土地—社会—生态”城市化协调度时空变化及其聚类模式[J]. 地理科学进展,2018,37(2):287-298.
[2]陈明星,陆大道,张华,等. 中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(4):387-398.
[3]程开明. 我国城市化阶段性演进特征及省级差异[J]. 改革,2008(3):79-85.
[4]李开宇. 行政区划调整对城市空间扩展的影响研究:以广州市番禺区为例[J]. 经济地理,2010,30(1):22-26.
[5]GEORGE L. Chinese urbanism in question:state,society,and the reproduction of urban spaces[J]. Urban geography,2007,28(1):7-29.
[6]陆大道,姚士谋,李国平,等. 基于我国国情的城镇化过程综合分析[J]. 经济地理,2007,27(6):883-887.
[7]CHEN J. Rapid urbanization in China:a real challenge to soil protection and food security[J]. Catena,2007,69(1):1-15.
[8]SONG J,DU H,LI S M. Smooth or troubled occupation transition?Urbanization and employment of former peasants in Western China[J]. China review,2018,18(1):79-106.
[9]周艳,黄贤金,徐国良,等. 长三角城市土地扩张与人口增长耦合态势及其驱动机制[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(2):313-324.
[10]陈炳,曾刚,曹贤忠,等. 长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):530-541.
[11]刘彦随,杨忍. 中国县域城镇化的空间特征与形成机理[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(8):1011-1020.
[12]陈凤桂,张虹鸥,吴旗韬,等. 我国人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调发展研究[J]. 人文地理,2010,25(5):53-58.
[13]李继红,马洪云,黄启. 山东省城市化与经济发展协调性研究[J]. 资源与产业,2016,18(2):23-30.
[14]臧锐,张鹏,杨青山,等. 吉林省城市化水平综合测度及时空演变[J]. 地理科学,2013,33(10):1231-1237.
[15]汪莹,陆林,黄剑锋,等. 上海、东京城市化进程及动力因子比较研究[J]. 人文地理,2017,32(3):77-85.
[16]甘静,郭付友,陈才,等. 2000年以来东北地区城市化空间分异的时空演变分析[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(5):565-574.
[17]冯兴华,钟业喜,李建新,等. 长江中游城市群县域城镇化水平空间格局演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(6):899-908.
[18]汪丽,李九全. 新型城镇化背景下的西北省会城市化质量评价及其动力机制[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(12):55-61.
[19]刘艳艳,王少剑. 珠三角地区城市化与生态环境的交互胁迫关系及耦合协调度[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(3):64-71.
[20]王雨晴,宋戈. 城市土地利用效益综合评价和案例研究[J]. 地理科学,2006,26(6):743-748.
[21]陈午,许新宜,王红瑞,等. 基于改进序关系法的北京市水资源可持续利用评价[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(1):164-176.
[22]耿海清,陈帆,詹存卫,等. 基于全局主成分分析的我国省级行政区城市化水平综合评价[J]. 人文地理,2009,24(5):47-51.
[23]范辉,刘卫东,吴泽斌,等. 浙江省人口城市化与土地城市化的耦合协调关系评价[J]. 经济地理,2014,34(12):21-28.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-09-15