[1]丁蕾,金卫东.基于城市旅游理性发展的典型城市比较研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2012,35(01):104-110.
Ding Lei,Jin Weidong.Comparative Study of Typical Cities Based on the Smart Development of Urban Tourism[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition),2012,35(01):104-110.
点击复制
基于城市旅游理性发展的典型城市比较研究(
)
《南京师大学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]
- 卷:
-
第35卷
- 期数:
-
2012年01期
- 页码:
-
104-110
- 栏目:
-
地理学
- 出版日期:
-
2012-03-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Comparative Study of Typical Cities Based on the Smart Development of Urban Tourism
- 作者:
-
丁蕾1; 2; 金卫东3
-
( 1. 南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏南京210093) ( 2. 南京大学金陵学院,江苏南京210089) ( 3. 南京市旅游园林局,江苏南京210019)
- Author(s):
-
Ding Lei1; 2; Jin Weidong3
-
1.School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China
-
- 关键词:
-
城市旅游理性发展; 指标体系; 比较研究
- Keywords:
-
the smart development of urban tourism; index system; comparative study
- 分类号:
-
F592.3
- 摘要:
-
从科学发展观的角度出发,依据城市旅游理性发展理论,讨论了城市旅游理性发展评价指标体系的构建原则,构建了包括游客满意指数、协调发展指数、旅游质量指数、产业贡献指数在内的城市旅游理性发展评价指标体系,给出了具体进行评价计算的方法,包括运用信息论中熵技术支持下的层次分析法( AHP) 测算指标权重、采用加权函数法计算综合评价结果,确定了城市旅游理性发展指数,设置了预警线的阈限值. 最后通过对南京、杭州、成都与苏州这4 个典型城市的比较研究表明,本文构建的城市旅游理性发展的评价指标体系具有适用性和可操作性,同时对城市旅游的实践也具有一定的指导意义.
- Abstract:
-
From the perspective of the scientific development concept,based on the theory of the smart development of urban tourism,this paper discusses the establishing principles of the index system of the evaluation of the smart development of urban tourism. Then it establishes the index system of the evaluation of the smart development of urban tourism, including visitor satisfaction index,coordinated development index,tourism quality index and industry contribution index. It gives out methods of conducting specific evaluation and calculation,including using analytic hierarchy process ( AHP) under the technical support of entropy in information theory to measure the index weights and using weighting function method to calculate comprehensive evaluation results. It decides the index of the smart development of urban tourism,sets threshold limit value of the early warning line. Finally,it makes a comparative study taking Nanjing,Hangzhou, Suzhou and Chengdu as four typical cities. The study shows that the index system of the evaluation of the smart development of urban tourism has applicability and feasibility. Meanwhile it has certain guiding meaning to the practice of urban tourism.
参考文献/References:
[1] 徐红罡,等. 城市旅游的增长机制研究[J]. 中山大学学报: 自然科学版,2006,45( 3) : 95-99.
[2] Gospodini A. Urban designs,urban space morphology,urban tourism,an emerging new paradigm concerning their relationship [J]. European Planning Studies,2001,9( 7) : 925-935.
[3] Herderson J. Attracting tourists to Singapore’s China town: a case study in conservation and promotion[J]. Tourism Management, 2000,21: 525-534.
[4] Karl W. Standardizing city tourism statistics [J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2000,27( 1) : 51-68.
[5] Mckercher B. Relationship between tourism and cultural heritage management: evidence from Hongkong[J]. Tourism Management, 2005,26: 539-548.
[6] 金卫东. 美国东部都市群旅游产业密集带的发展及启示[J]. 旅游学刊,2004,19( 6) : 38-42.
[7] 吴必虎. 中国城市居民旅游目的地选择行为研究[J]. 地理学报, 1997, 52( 2) : 97-103.
[8] 宋章海. 从旅游者角度对旅游目的地形象的探讨[J]. 旅游学刊,2000, 15( 1) : 63-67.
[9] 丁蕾,吴小根,丁洁. 城市旅游竞争力评价指标体系的构建及应用[J]. 经济地理,2006, 26( 3) : 511-515.
[10] 苏伟忠,杨英宝,顾朝林. 城市旅游竞争力评价初探[J]. 旅游学刊,2003, 18( 3) : 39-42.
[11] 张梦. 区域旅游业竞争力评价: 指标构建与方法选择[J]. 旅游学刊,2007, 22( 2) : 13-17.
[12] 方创琳,毛汉英. 区域发展规划指标体系建立方法探讨[J]. 地理学报,1999,54( 5) : 410-419.
[13] 王莲芬,许树柏. 层次分析法引论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,1990: 20-22.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
基金项目:教育部科学技术成果鉴定项目( 鉴字[教CW2009]第015 号) .
通讯联系人:丁蕾,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向: 旅游地理与旅游规划. E-mail: flora0915@163. com
更新日期/Last Update:
2013-03-11