|Table of Contents|

Study on the Optimization of Tourism Transportation System ofUrban and Rural Settlements in Water Network Area—A Case Study of Jinhu County(PDF)

《南京师大学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1001-4616/CN:32-1239/N]

Issue:
2020年04期
Page:
45-52
Research Field:
·地理学·
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Optimization of Tourism Transportation System ofUrban and Rural Settlements in Water Network Area—A Case Study of Jinhu County
Author(s):
Gong Yaxi1; Ji Xiang1; 2; Zhang Yuan3
(1.School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)(2.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construction Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)(3.School of Architecture and Design,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)
Keywords:
water network area; spatial syntax; fractal theory; traffic network; tourism resource
PACS:
TU984.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2020.04.008
Abstract:
Taking Jinhu County as the object in this paper,space syntax theory is adopted to build the transportation accessibility model by land and water to discuss the urban and rural settlements traffic condition from the view of accessibility and convenience. Fractal structure theory is applied to build a spatial measurement model of tourism resources to analyze distribution features of characteristic tourist spots from the view of centrality and relevance and put forward optimization strategies. In the urban and rural settlements,the county seat and Huaijian are located in the land and water transportation center respectively,with the reachability index of 1.09 and 0.80,which is the best; affected by the water network,the tourism resources of Jinhu County have bifractal characteristics,and the aggregation dimension D=0.220 8 and 1.016 9,the correlation dimension D’=1.164 2; the accessibility of transportation network is good in each tourism resource aggregation area,and the cattle crow dimension ratio d=0.86.

References:

[1] 黄柯,祝建军,蒲素. 我国旅游交通发展现状及研究述评[J]. 人文地理,2007,22(1):23-27.
[2]余菲菲,胡文海,荣慧芳. 中小城市旅游经济与交通耦合协调发展研究:以池州市为例[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(9):1116-1122.
[3]韩艳,李婉莹,杨光. 基于节点重要度的景区交通网络可靠性分析[J]. 交通信息与安全,2019,37(6):128-138.
[4]田野,罗静,崔家兴,等. 长江经济带旅游资源空间结构及其交通可进入性评价[J]. 经济地理,2019,39(11):203-213.
[5]胡浩,王姣娥,金凤君. 基于可达性的中小文化旅游城市旅游潜力分析[J]. 地理科学进展,2012,31(6):808-816.
[6]罗雅丽,李同昇,张常新,等. 乡镇地域多功能性评价与主导功能定位:以金湖县为例[J]. 人文地理,2016,31(3):94-101.
[7]张常新. 县域镇村空间重构研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2015.
[8]李潜,唐波,彭永超. 珠三角城市群4A级及以上旅游景点空间特征和可达性测度[J]. 地理信息世界,2020,27(1):78-83.
[9]陈淇瑶,廖和平,刘愿理,等. 重庆市县域交通可达性与多维贫困耦合关系研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(4):12-24.
[10]李康康,戢晓峰. 景区综合交通可达性测度及其优化对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(3):668-677.
[11]HAWAS Y E,HASSAN M N,ABULIBDEH A. A multicriteria approach of assessing public transport accessibility at a strategic level[J]. Journal of transport geography,2016,57(9):19-34.
[12]张玉洋,孙雅婷,姚崇怀. 空间句法在城市公园可达性研究中的应用:以武汉三环线内城市公园为例[J]. 中国园林,2019,35(11):92-96.
[13]HANSEN W G. How accessibility shapes land use[J]. Journal of the American institute of planners,1959,25(2):73-76.
[14]许金如,段七零. 省域高等级景区系统关联分形的时空演化特征:以江苏省为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版),2014,37(2):126-133.
[15]苏章全,明庆忠,陈英. 基于集聚分形维数的旅游区空间结构测评与优化:以云南丽江市古城区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发,2011,30(10):103-107.
[16]杨晓敏,李玲琴,付建新,等. 30 a青海省公路可达性及县域经济联系格局演化[J]. 干旱区地理,2018,41(6):1376-1387.
[17]尹秀秀,叶持跃,林雄斌,等. 基于全域自驾游可达性的青海省旅游空间结构研究[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版):2019,53(2):298-308.
[18]SAMMY C H L,PETER R,ADE O. Destination marketing:the use of technology since the millennium[J]. Journal of destination marketing & management,2017,6(2):95-102.
[19]张济忠. 分形[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,1995.
[20]洪流,杨武年,黄波. 成都市交通网络的分形特征[J]. 公路,2019(11):158-162.
[21]詹运州,李艳. 特大城市城乡生态空间规划方法及实施机制思考[J]. 城市规划学刊,2011,194(2):49-57.
[22]陈旭霞. 乡村旅游资源两种经营模式比较研究:兼论金湖县乡村旅游资源经营模式的选择[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2009.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-11-15